[Lowfer] More 3 in CT

[Jay Rusgrove]

John

I'll run some captures starting around noon and throughout this afternoon. I'll
also do some "cursory" checks while I'm there. Would be nice to have multiple
cursors and leave them parked on the appropriate frequencies. With frequency
control as good as it is there would be a signal level readout on the captures -
assuming the code element was under the cursor at the time. Fast capture rates
would take care of that problem.

Jay Rusgrove, W1VD

John Andrews wrote:

> Jay,
>
> > It seems as though daytime signal levels are much more stable. Would you
> like
> > some  daytime shots to better determine your signal level? I work about a
> mile
> > away from my house so I often run home at noontime for lunch.
>
> That would be a help. I will be running today and tomorrow, but want to
> detour to receiving stuff on Friday.
>
> If you were in front of the computer while receiving the signal, it would be
> interesting to position the cursor over WA and then TAG, noting the dB
> readings at the bottom of the Argo screen. With WA, it would be important to
> know if he was at normal power, or in the -20 dB mode. Should be obvious on
> your screen, as normal power makes those fat lines. Now, in real life,
> Bill's the skinny one, and I'm the , er..., ample one. But lowfering is
> nothing like real life.
>
> John A.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Lowfer@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer