[Lowfer] vlf tx loop question
Brian Helms
[email protected]
Tue, 1 Jan 2002 21:18:14 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_01B3_01C19309.D31A7600
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Will a triangular loop perform as well as a square or rectangular loop =
for vlf transmitting? I have found using the rjeloop program that =
square and rectangular loops require less wire for maximum inductance =
compared to a triangular loop. I would greatly appreciate any thoughts =
or experience on this topic.
Brian Helms
KD4RLD
------=_NextPart_000_01B3_01C19309.D31A7600
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Will a triangular loop perform as well as a square =
or=20
rectangular loop for vlf transmitting? I have found using the =
rjeloop=20
program that square and rectangular loops require less wire for maximum=20
inductance compared to a triangular loop. I would greatly =
appreciate any=20
thoughts or experience on this topic.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Brian Helms</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>KD4RLD</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_01B3_01C19309.D31A7600--