[Lowfer] Common Freq

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 20:42:54 -0600

I'd be game for that one.

Mike>WE0H
http://www.geocities.com/we0h/index.html

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of Peter Barick
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 1:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Lowfer] Common Freq

Re: Common Coordinated Beacon Frequency System

CCBFS: UG! Don't like the looks of that but that's what it condenses
to. This is meant to elaborate on Rye's point of having a few deacons on
a near-common ferq for propagation monitoring. Yes, it goes on now in an
ad hoc fashion: Two lowfers thinking, "Wouldn't it be nice if ..." and
set up on a chosen freq, others monitor same and report capture results.
All interesting.

Rye's thought of a greater quantity of near-freq beacons prompted me to
reason, "And why not devise a division of regions that would be assigned
region local beacons to operate in?" So, say, there were the N-E-S-W
regions, someone, or more, could populate nearby freqs. Listeners then
could monitor that one activity channel. Convient and brings more
listening to one channel.

I'm not suggesting anything formal with rules [Oh heavens!], no, but
somewhat along the lines things are done now, via list groups. Has it
been tried?

Peter
------------------------------------------
>>> [email protected] 02/26/02 11:45AM >>>
<<klip>>

>>It sure would be nice if everybody nestled together on a few
>>hz segment ...
>>Hopefully 5 or six stations could occupy a 4Hz segment with
>>a little coordination -- maybe even more.

>>Rye

_______________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer