[Lowfer] reply to

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 21:59:08 -0600

I agree. It sucks to have a reply go to the list when it was meant to go to
one person. I had such a post go a stray tonight. At least no one has yet to
slam me for my opinions. I think it is ridiculous to have the reflector as
the default address in a reply situation. Again, it sucks big time.

Mike>WE0H
http://www.geocities.com/we0h/index.html

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of WB9UWA Jim Shaffer
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 2:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Lowfer] reply to

Hi All,

Since the reply to goes automatically to the list rather then the sender,
there are a huge number of post going to this reflector. Anyone else
see a problem with this? It's getting to be a big job sorting and saving
only
post that have general value to the list. Most list practice conservation of
words.
I do not wish to unsubscribe from the list, because there is frequently
ground breaking
work reported here. Not to complain, but perhaps it was better before?

73, Jim Shaffer, WB9UWA.

_______________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer