[Lowfer] TMO

Mike Staines [email protected]
Sun, 8 Dec 2002 13:17:08 -0500


Sorry, Lewis. It wasn't TMO, unless my incredibly strong vertical component
bounced off of Pluto thus explaining the delay time.

I have been uncomfortable with stepping on others as the frequency drifts so
I am off until I can come up with some other configuration.

Mike
wa1ptc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Lewis Denton
> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 10:55 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Lowfer] TMO
>
>
> I Think i got TMO last night, at least that what is on the screen
> 185.3295 QRSS60, but i thought i seen a email that he was going to be off
> for a while.
> also a trace of MP, not enough to ID though. and their was
> another trace at
> 185.301. around midnight.
> only in for about two cap's.
> Lewis
> God Bless America
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lyle Koehler" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 09:06 AM
> Subject: [Lowfer] BRO and LEK captures
>
>
> > Congratulations to Denis and Lloyd on their captures of BRO and LEK last
> > night. Denis, I expect that we can claim a new DX record of
> 1160 miles for
> a
> > LowFER MT-Hell signal. Of course, it helps that nobody else is
> using that
> > mode :-)
> >
> > Time to print up a new batch of QSLs!
> >
> > Lyle, K0LR
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > >From the Lowfer mailing list
> > Send messages to: [email protected]
> > To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: [email protected]
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer