[Lowfer] "WE" in QRSS-60 now and freq measurements...

[Jay Rusgrove]

Bill/John

I've heard rumors of development of a mercury electron frequency standard that
is several orders of magnitude better than cesium. When they get it running they
could always check it against WA for accuracy!

Quiet conditions at the lake this afternoon so I ran an August capture of TAG
and WA. I don't have a GPS setup here so frequency calibration is not it's usual
level of accuracy.

http://www.advancedreceiver.com/capture/TAGWA080302.jpg

Jay

Bill Ashlock wrote:

> John,
>
> > > 185.3000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
> >
> >You did that just to get a rise out of me, right? Since when have you >been
> >maintaining that level of precision? There's been moss growing on >the
> >north side of your crystal for years! Now, Jay Rusgrove manages to >stay
> >right on .301, and I'm usually within 10 mHz of .302, so why >don't you
> >scrape a little moss off and join the crowd? <g>
>
> Well... the problem here is that you guys are just forgetting who is the
> loop leader. My signal will always be the one to set your atomic clock to. I
> paid a whole 82 cents for this rock and intend to get my full moneys worth.
> :(
>
> Bill
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
> http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
>
> _______________________________________________
> >From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: Lowfer@mailman.qth.net
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer