[LOGic] logic 9 install problem

Thu May 17 02:27:45 EDT 2012

I've installed Logic 9 on a windows 7 ultimate 64 bit system and it runs 
pretty well.  i've got a short list going of some errors i'm seeing, but 
none are show stoppers.  maybe you should uninstall and try reinstalling 
it.  i'm not running mine in any compatibility modes or as the 
administrator, but that might be something you could look at too.  when 
i've had install issues and problems in the past, dennis has been 
helpful getting things going.  perhaps you should talk to him.

kenb, ky5g

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	James Meaney <mailto:k2snj at comcast.net>
> Wednesday, May 16, 2012 10:19 PM
>
>
> I have installed Logic 9. What a mistake this program is, After I
> installed I went in tools and setup my rig and I get a error that
> Logic.exe has incurred and error and is shutting down. This error come
> up every time I start Logic 9. I have errors with Logic 8 but this I
> cannot even get started. This programs should NEVER have been released.
> What a total waste of money. Running Windows 7 64bit Intel I5. I guess I
> just got a $89 friz be!!
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	Bill VanAlstyne W5WVO <mailto:w5wvo at cybermesa.net>
> Monday, May 14, 2012 10:18 PM
>
>
> Hank et al.,
>
> Your post begs my original question of a few days ago, which remains
> unanswered -- Is v8 still being updated / bugfixed? If V9 is basically at
> Alpha level (which is what I would call it, based on your description 
> of its
> architectural evolution, and as such, should not have been released to 
> the
> user base) -- then are known and reported problems in V8, the released
> production version, being addressed, or are we just expected to live with
> them until V9 is ready for its close-up? (Whenever that is?) And we 
> are just
> expected to have faith that the perpetually unfixed V8 bugs are being
> addressed in V9, and will work... someday?
>
> Now, I'm a computer old-timer, and I've always volunteered for Beta 
> programs
> whenever given the chance -- but IMO V9 isn't even really ready for Beta,
> because it is still under active development. A Beta test is expected to
> have a Release Candidate, a version of the entire product that is 
> believed
> to be complete and relatively bug-free based on the results of the Alpha
> stage of testing, but of course is known not to be. The Beta volunteer 
> user
> base (not everyone cottons to the idea of testing imperfect software and
> finding bugs) tests, details, and reports the remaining bugs, and they 
> get
> killed, one at a time and usually in triage fashion, with the highest
> priority bugs addressed first. That's fine. But SUPPORT OF THE RELEASED
> PRODUCTION CODE GOES ON during the Alpha and Beta stages of the next
> version! Otherwise, the end user is left with production code (V8) 
> that used
> to be supported, but that isn't any more due to reassignment of
> development/support resources to the new version in Alpha or Beta test --
> which are known to be (a) incomplete or (b) imperfect vehicles,
> respectively.
>
> If I might be allowed to put it crudely, this situation blows big-time.
>
> Dennis needs to clarify this.
>
> Bill W5WVO
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hank Phillips
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 16:37
> To: logic at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [LOGic] LOGic forum
>
> When Microsoft notified the world in 2007 that Visual FoxPro would no 
> longer
> be supported, Dennis didn't really have a choice about continuing
> development in that language. Converting everything to .NET is not a
> trivial undertaking, so I would recommend that we be patient while that
> conversion process continues to take shape.
>
> I purchased Logic9, installed it, and run it side by side with Logic8.
> Logic8 continues to be my logger of choice for DXing, while I am 
> waiting for
> Logic9 to catch up. My recommendation is to throw our support behind the
> continuing development of Logic9, because it will be on a platform 
> that has
> a stated future in the Microsoft world, and just hang tight until the 
> kinks
> are worked out.
>
> Vy 73,
> Hank
> AA4HP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
> On Behalf Of K0DAN
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:21 AM
> To: logic at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [LOGic] LOGic forum
>
> I need to throw my $0.02 in too.
>
> I much prefer this email list to the "web based" forum alternative which I
> guess is now the official site? Sending/receiving LOGIC-related info 
> is much
> easier using an "email approach" than posting on a forum (in my opinion).
>
> I too started with LOGIC 4 and have not gone beyond LOGIC 8. It meets 99%
> of my needs, and yes, has a few quirks, which I live with. I won't go into
> them because it's not worth the bother.
>
> But my questions are regarding LOGIC 9...
> a) For those of you have gone from V8 to V9, what do you gain? What do you
> lose?
> b) I have always had trouble when upgrading LOGIC versions, in that the
> default databases (especially PREFIX and DXCC tables) do not meet my 
> needs.
> In the past I have had to spend a lot of time fixing errors produced 
> by the
> upgrades, rebuilding tables to suit my needs, etc. If I were to do a
> standard install of LOGIC9, then import my log files, is there a way to
> simply COPY my LOGIC8 directories and files on top of the new version? 
> Which
> files & directories? What to avoid?
>
> Glad to see there is still some life on this list!
>
> 73
> dan
> k0dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim
> Sent: May 13, 2012 08:19 AM
> To: logic at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [LOGic] How to post to the LOGic forum
>
>
> Post your questions here.
>
> Jim
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	Hank Phillips <mailto:aa4hp at titustek.com>
> Sunday, May 13, 2012 9:37 AM
>
>
> When Microsoft notified the world in 2007 that Visual FoxPro would no 
> longer
> be supported, Dennis didn't really have a choice about continuing
> development in that language. Converting everything to .NET is not a
> trivial undertaking, so I would recommend that we be patient while that
> conversion process continues to take shape.
>
> I purchased Logic9, installed it, and run it side by side with Logic8.
> Logic8 continues to be my logger of choice for DXing, while I am 
> waiting for
> Logic9 to catch up. My recommendation is to throw our support behind the
> continuing development of Logic9, because it will be on a platform 
> that has
> a stated future in the Microsoft world, and just hang tight until the 
> kinks
> are worked out.
>
> Vy 73,
> Hank
> AA4HP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
> On Behalf Of K0DAN
> Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 11:21 AM
> To: logic at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [LOGic] LOGic forum
>
> I need to throw my $0.02 in too.
>
> I much prefer this email list to the "web based" forum alternative which I
> guess is now the official site? Sending/receiving LOGIC-related info 
> is much
> easier using an "email approach" than posting on a forum (in my opinion).
>
> I too started with LOGIC 4 and have not gone beyond LOGIC 8. It meets 99%
> of my needs, and yes, has a few quirks, which I live with. I won't go into
> them because it's not worth the bother.
>
> But my questions are regarding LOGIC 9...
> a) For those of you have gone from V8 to V9, what do you gain? What do you
> lose?
> b) I have always had trouble when upgrading LOGIC versions, in that the
> default databases (especially PREFIX and DXCC tables) do not meet my 
> needs.
> In the past I have had to spend a lot of time fixing errors produced 
> by the
> upgrades, rebuilding tables to suit my needs, etc. If I were to do a
> standard install of LOGIC9, then import my log files, is there a way to
> simply COPY my LOGIC8 directories and files on top of the new version? 
> Which
> files & directories? What to avoid?
>
> Glad to see there is still some life on this list!
>
> 73
> dan
> k0dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim
> Sent: May 13, 2012 08:19 AM
> To: logic at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [LOGic] How to post to the LOGic forum
>
>
> Post your questions here.
>
> Jim
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	K0DAN <mailto:k0dan at comcast.net>
> Sunday, May 13, 2012 8:21 AM
>
>
> I need to throw my $0.02 in too.
>
> I much prefer this email list to the "web based" forum alternative 
> which I
> guess is now the official site? Sending/receiving LOGIC-related info 
> is much
> easier using an "email approach" than posting on a forum (in my opinion).
>
> I too started with LOGIC 4 and have not gone beyond LOGIC 8. It meets 99%
> of my needs, and yes, has a few quirks, which I live with. I won't go 
> into
> them because it's not worth the bother.
>
> But my questions are regarding LOGIC 9...
> a) For those of you have gone from V8 to V9, what do you gain? What do 
> you
> lose?
> b) I have always had trouble when upgrading LOGIC versions, in that the
> default databases (especially PREFIX and DXCC tables) do not meet my 
> needs.
> In the past I have had to spend a lot of time fixing errors produced 
> by the
> upgrades, rebuilding tables to suit my needs, etc. If I were to do a
> standard install of LOGIC9, then import my log files, is there a way to
> simply COPY my LOGIC8 directories and files on top of the new version? 
> Which
> files & directories? What to avoid?
>
> Glad to see there is still some life on this list!
>
> 73
> dan
> k0dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim
> Sent: May 13, 2012 08:19 AM
> To: logic at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [LOGic] How to post to the LOGic forum
>
>
> Post your questions here.
>
> Jim
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 	Jim <mailto:jbrannig at verizon.net>
> Sunday, May 13, 2012 6:19 AM
>
>
> Post your questions here.
>
> Jim
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html