[LOGic] DX OR PREFIX TABLE ERROR

[Dennis]

Thanks for the info -- I added JD1BMH to my JD1-O entry.  Let me know if 
there is anything further that can be done.

Tnx & 73,

Dennis WN4AZH

On 1/11/2011 7:01 PM, K0DAN wrote:
> Thanks to those who responded to my inquiry, and confirmed what I 
> suspected, that JD1BMH is Ogasawara.
> What I *should have asked* is what LOGic's Prefix Table SHOULD look like?
> Mine has the following entries for JD1-M and JD1-O:
> JD1-M    JD1-M, JD1    Minami-tori-shima
> JD1-O    JD1-O, JD1    Volcano Is Group
> (and also generic JA also includes JD)
> So JD1BMH, the ham I worked, could have been in any of these DXCC 
> island groups, or anywhere in Japan for that matter. Which means the 
> next rare entity could be missed by LOGic and incorrectly placed.
> Can this be massaged out of the Prefix Table, or is this another 
> licensing inconsistency which originates with Japan's licensing 
> authority? I  have JD1BMH properly placed in JD1-O, but am thinking 
> about the next rare one....
> Thanks and 73
> Dan
> K0DAN
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* K0DAN <mailto:k0dan at comcast.net>
>     *To:* logic_software at yahoogroups.com
>     <mailto:logic_software at yahoogroups.com> ; logic at mailman.qth.net
>     <mailto:logic at mailman.qth.net>
>     *Cc:* dh at hosenose.com <mailto:dh at hosenose.com>
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:55 PM
>     *Subject:* DX OR PREFIX TABLE ERROR
>
>     Hi LOGic group, I'd like some assistance to determine if I worked
>     a rare DX prefix I've been chasing, or have a long-standing prefix
>     table problem?
>     I recently worked JD1BMH, as he was in my WANTED list as MINAMI
>     TORISHIMA (JD1-M).
>     My PREFIX TABLE (probably the original that came with LOGic 4, and
>     manually modified over the years) shows some conflicts with MINAMI
>     TORISHIMA (MARCUS ISLAND?), VOLCANO ISLANDS GROUP (OGASAWARA -
>     BONIN ISLAND).
>     The web page for JD1BMH suggests Ogasawara.
>     Some of the LOGic users are religious about keeping their Prefix
>     Table current (I try to but, but....)...
>     Would someone help me with the reality of the correct Prefix
>     Table, and in so-doing advise if I have worked a new entity to my
>     DXCC lists?
>     Thanks and 73
>     Dan
>     K0DAN
>