USA DXCC "K" Designator: was RE: [LOGic] DXCC K vs KP
R Johnson
k1vu at tmlp.com
Thu Feb 2 22:15:03 EST 2006
Hi Rich:
I'm not 100% sure of what you are asking about "W" and how it relates
to this topic.
Maybe this will help.
The USA is assigned a DXCC letter designation of "K" and a
numerical designation of "291" .
The USA is assigned call prefixes of A,K,N, and W; and all Alpha/Numeric
permutations of the first letter of the prefix, such as WA1, KL7, AA5, etc.
and therefor exist as valid calls under the DXCC "K" designator !!!
Here is a Table of call prefixes for the DXCC Entity ="K", OR ="291" OR the USA.
AAA-ALZ
KAA-KZZ
NAA-NZZ
WAA-WZZ
Rich, I hope this helps, if not I will try to confuse you more :-) !!!
If anyone takes exception to my explanation, PLEASE jump in on this !!!
73
Bob, K1VU
At 21:00 2/2/2006, Rich Kelly wrote:
>How does that explain returns being given that start with "W"?
>
>Rich Kelly
>KB9RNO
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
>On Behalf Of mel martin
>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 6:53 PM
>To: 'R Johnson'; logic at mailman.qth.net; dh at hosenose.com
>Subject: RE: [LOGic] DXCC K vs KP
>
>"K will match any string starting with "K"
>
>Use "K_" K followed by an underscore...
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>> [mailto:logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of R Johnson
>> Sent: January 31, 2006 23:02
>> To: logic at mailman.qth.net; dh at hosenose.com
>> Subject: [LOGic] DXCC K vs KP
>>
>>
>> Hi All:
>> Now that LoTW has added the WAS Award, I've been trying to do
>> some sorting.
>>
>> I download my "LoTW ADIF Report" and Import into a blank copy
>> of Logic7.
>>
>> I have found that if you do a filter on "DXCC=K" and
>> "STATE=EMPTY" on the LoTW confirmed QSO's, I find that the
>> "KP" QSO's show up in the query results.
>>
>> For my current LoTW "WAS" Confirmations I get 14 hits, 13 of
>> which are from KP2's and WP2's !!!
>>
>> I have looked at the "List of Valid Values" for "DXCC and
>> "States" and can't find any discrepancies in the lists that
>> would make "K" and "KP" look the same.
>>
>> Maybe there is another "List" that I missed, or maybe there
>> is a problem in the "Filtering Algorithm" in LOGic 7.
>>
>> Can anyone give me some incite to what I might be doing wrong ?
>>
>> TNX es 73
>> Bob, K1VU
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LOGic mailing list
>> LOGic at mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.25/247 - Release
>> Date: 2006-01-31
>>
>>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.0/248 - Release Date: 2006-02-01
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.0/248 - Release Date: 2/1/2006
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.0/248 - Release Date: 2/1/2006
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
Hi Rich:
I'm not 100% sure of what you are asking about "W" and how it relates
to this topic.
Maybe this will help.
The USA is assigned a DXCC letter designation of "K" and a
numerical designation of "291" .
The USA is assigned call prefixes of A,K,N, and W; and all Alpha/Numeric
permutations of the first letter of the prefix, such as WA1, KL7, AA5, etc.
and therefor exist as valid calls under the DXCC "K" designator !!!
Here is a Table of call prefixes for the DXCC Entity ="K", OR ="291" OR the USA.
AAA-ALZ
KAA-KZZ
NAA-NZZ
WAA-WZZ
Rich, I hope this helps, if not I will try to confuse you more :-) !!!
If anyone takes exception to my explanation, PLEASE jump in on this !!!
73
Bob, K1VU
At 21:00 2/2/2006, Rich Kelly wrote:
>How does that explain returns being given that start with "W"?
>
>Rich Kelly
>KB9RNO
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
>On Behalf Of mel martin
>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 6:53 PM
>To: 'R Johnson'; logic at mailman.qth.net; dh at hosenose.com
>Subject: RE: [LOGic] DXCC K vs KP
>
>"K will match any string starting with "K"
>
>Use "K_" K followed by an underscore...
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>> [mailto:logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of R Johnson
>> Sent: January 31, 2006 23:02
>> To: logic at mailman.qth.net; dh at hosenose.com
>> Subject: [LOGic] DXCC K vs KP
>>
>>
>> Hi All:
>> Now that LoTW has added the WAS Award, I've been trying to do
>> some sorting.
>>
>> I download my "LoTW ADIF Report" and Import into a blank copy
>> of Logic7.
>>
>> I have found that if you do a filter on "DXCC=K" and
>> "STATE=EMPTY" on the LoTW confirmed QSO's, I find that the
>> "KP" QSO's show up in the query results.
>>
>> For my current LoTW "WAS" Confirmations I get 14 hits, 13 of
>> which are from KP2's and WP2's !!!
>>
>> I have looked at the "List of Valid Values" for "DXCC and
>> "States" and can't find any discrepancies in the lists that
>> would make "K" and "KP" look the same.
>>
>> Maybe there is another "List" that I missed, or maybe there
>> is a problem in the "Filtering Algorithm" in LOGic 7.
>>
>> Can anyone give me some incite to what I might be doing wrong ?
>>
>> TNX es 73
>> Bob, K1VU
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LOGic mailing list
>> LOGic at mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.25/247 - Release
>> Date: 2006-01-31
>>
>>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.0/248 - Release Date: 2006-02-01
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.0/248 - Release Date: 2/1/2006
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.0/248 - Release Date: 2/1/2006
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
At 21:00 2/2/2006, Rich Kelly wrote:
>How does that explain returns being given that start with "W"?
>
>Rich Kelly
>KB9RNO
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
>On Behalf Of mel martin
>Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 6:53 PM
>To: 'R Johnson'; logic at mailman.qth.net; dh at hosenose.com
>Subject: RE: [LOGic] DXCC K vs KP
>
>"K will match any string starting with "K"
>
>Use "K_" K followed by an underscore...
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>> [mailto:logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of R Johnson
>> Sent: January 31, 2006 23:02
>> To: logic at mailman.qth.net; dh at hosenose.com
>> Subject: [LOGic] DXCC K vs KP
>>
>>
>> Hi All:
>> Now that LoTW has added the WAS Award, I've been trying to do
>> some sorting.
>>
>> I download my "LoTW ADIF Report" and Import into a blank copy
>> of Logic7.
>>
>> I have found that if you do a filter on "DXCC=K" and
>> "STATE=EMPTY" on the LoTW confirmed QSO's, I find that the
>> "KP" QSO's show up in the query results.
>>
>> For my current LoTW "WAS" Confirmations I get 14 hits, 13 of
>> which are from KP2's and WP2's !!!
>>
>> I have looked at the "List of Valid Values" for "DXCC and
>> "States" and can't find any discrepancies in the lists that
>> would make "K" and "KP" look the same.
>>
>> Maybe there is another "List" that I missed, or maybe there
>> is a problem in the "Filtering Algorithm" in LOGic 7.
>>
>> Can anyone give me some incite to what I might be doing wrong ?
>>
>> TNX es 73
>> Bob, K1VU
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LOGic mailing list
>> LOGic at mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.25/247 - Release
>> Date: 2006-01-31
>>
>>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.0/248 - Release Date: 2006-02-01
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.0/248 - Release Date: 2/1/2006
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.0/248 - Release Date: 2/1/2006
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>LOGic at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
More information about the LOGic
mailing list