[Logic] LoTW confirmations

Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:57:53 -0400

There have been some very recent changes to LOTW that allows you to
re-export an ADIF file with confirmation status...

see: http://www.arrl.org/lotw/developer/adifout.html

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Arthur Tan" <[email protected]>
To: "LOGic reflector" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 15:45
Subject: Re: RE: [Logic] LoTW confirmations

> Hi,
>
> I think the real issue is when is LoTW going to offer a way to export
> *their* confirmation data in a format importable into LOGic.
> Otherwise, no matter what system we use, it's going to be by hand
> (virtually).  As it is now, you have to go through your log one by one
> and somehow mark LoTW confirmations.  Anyone have any info on that?
>
> 73, Art
>
>
> From Dave <[email protected]> on Wed, Oct 15, 2003:
>
> > Chris,
> >
> > Just a thought. Do you think another check box located near the 2 for
QSL's
> > that are there already solve the problem? It would still involve
checking it
> > and entering the notation in the comment field but should work.
> >
> > Jacques
> > Email [email protected]
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On
> > Behalf Of C.M. Christensen
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:03 PM
> > To: Logic
> > Subject: [Logic] LoTW confirmations
> >
> > Howdy all,
> >
> > I am sure that each of you, including Dennis, has given this a great
> > deal of thought over the past few days or weeks.
> >
> > We are going to need some method of importing our LoTW confirmations
> > into Logic so it shows DXCCSUB: in the comment field to indicate that
> > the qso has been confirmed. Obviously, other awards such as WAS, etc.,
> > etc., will also need to be addressed.
> >
> > I am especially concerned that we are still capable of keeping a true
> > record of the QSL cards that we send and receive. This must be separate
> > from the LoTW confirmations. While it will be possible to have both a
> > QSL card confirmation and an LoTW confirmation, it is also possible to
> > have either one without the other. What I don't want to see is a system
> > that marks an F in either the QSLS or QSLR boxes (or both) unless we
> > actually have a card.
> >
> > Knowing the ability Dennis has to get things right I am sure he is way
> > ahead of me on this but I just wanted to stick my oar in the water
> > before it was too late, hi.
> >
> > -- 
> > 73,
> > Chris, AC?M
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic