[Logic] LOTW

[Carl Smidt]

Hi Chris,

Yes, but I didn't have anything listed after the /.

I use the / to indicate a portable operation, unless the operation is =
taking place in another call district and then I use /8. For example: =
W4AT/8. I think that these went through ok, only the W4AT/, etc., were =
rejected. Any ideas?

I wish that I could get the 'our of range' list of calls back so that I =
could have a closer look, but I don't know where to look.

73,   Carl   VE9OV


----- Original Message -----=20
From: "C.M. Christensen" <cchrisac0m@cox.net>
To: <logic@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Logic] LOTW


> Hi Carl,
>=20
> I don't understand why this would be a problem. I uploaded 8,830 qso =
and=20
> many hundred of them were with stations that signed /something. No=20
> problems at all with LoTW taking them. You can do a mass change to get =

> rid of the / but you would not want to do that because then you would=20
> not get a match with any of those contacts. Perhaps someone else can=20
> shed some light on this but if not I would send a note to=20
> lotw-help@arrl.org and have them look into it. Good luck.
> --=20
> 73,
> Chris, AC=D8M
>=20
> Carl Smidt wrote:
>=20
> > Hi All,
> >=20
> > Just uploaded 6,228 QSO's covering my VE9 call effective since Dec. =
'93.
> >=20
> > Had 2,421 listed as outside the range, with the rest accepted.
> >=20
> > My main problem was using the / as a portable designator, ie., =
W1AT/.
> >=20
> > Do I now have to go through 2,421 records to get rid of the / ???  =
Or can I do a mass change??
> >=20
> > What are they looking for to indicate having worked a portable =
station?
> >=20
> > Any comments appreciated. Thank you.
> >=20
> > 73,   Carl  VE9OV
> >=20