[Logic] Re: ARRL LOTW

Wed, 21 May 2003 23:14:29 -0500

I agree with you although the authenticity of LOTW is technically better and
easier to provide (or could be ) but you are also correct that even eqsl is
overkill on the authentication part.

I am a Life memeber so doubt I will drop out :-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Carl J. Denbow
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 9:40 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Logic] Re: ARRL LOTW
>
>
> In following this thread, I have but one comment. The eQSL system
> is easier, quicker and just as well authenticated as LOTW.  The
> only reason the ARRL won't accept eQSL cards is that they have
> too much invested in the LOTW.  I'm a ARRL member and have been
> for years.  I won't cancel my membership over this issue, but
> nothing has made me more angry toward the League that I can
> remember.  I had a good discussion at Dayton about this with some
> of the principals and the ARRL's position simply does not hold up
> to close scrutiny!
>
> 73
>
> Carl - N8VZ
> --�
> Carl J. Denbow, [email protected] on 5/21/2003
>
>
> On Tue, 20 May 2003 08:42:57 -0500, C.M. Christensen wrote:
> >Howdy all,
> >
> >A couple of other things to watch out for when you convert your
> >Logic
> >log to .ADI and then into LoTW. If you have mobile stations in your
> >log
> >such as AC0M-M it will reject them. AC0M/M works fine but may cause
> >some
> >fits in Logic regarding proper placement of the contact according to
> >the
> >/M designator. Also, watch for CWN and PTOR in the mode column. LoTW
> >wants CW and TOR according to their mode list.
> >
> >I did not experience any difficulty with the select criteria in the
> >Logic header but the USB and LSB thing gave me fits. Wish I could
> >remember how to mass update the log and I would change all of the
> >USB
> >and LSB in my entire log to SSB. Back to the help pages I guess, hi.
> >
> >My question is how are we going to handle confirmations for DXCC
> >etc.,
> >in Logic once LoTW goes live. We are all comfortable with the F, R,
> >etc., in the QSLS and QSLR boxes on the log page and with checking
> >in
> >QSL cards. We will have to keep this information current to maintain
> >our
> >proper totals in Logic but we really won't have a QSL card. Perhaps
> >an
> >additional box on the log page to indicate TQSL confirmation would
> >work
> >but it will have to add into the band, county, mode, etc. totals in
> >Logic.
> >--
> >73,
> >Chris, AC�M
> >
> >PDA wrote:
> >>Dear Carl:
> >>
> >>With two minor problems, LOGic appears to
> >>work fine with LOTW.
> >>
> >>The two known problems are
> >>
> >>1). �LOGIc sends USB and LSB instead of
> >>SSB. �I will fix this, but meanwhile fix it with
> >>Notepad.
> >>
> >>2). �The select criterial that LOGic puts in
> >>the header makes LOTW croak. �This is
> >>their fault. �Meanwhile, just delete it with
> >>notepad.
> >>
> >>Let me know if any questions.
> >>
> >>Tnx &�73,
> >>
> >>Dennis WN4AZY
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Dear Dennis,
> >>>
> >>>How are you coming with the subject addition to LOGic?
> >>>
> >>>I see that they are now beta testing.
> >>>
> >>>73, Carl VE9OV
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>================================
> >>WHEN REPLYING, PLEASE INCLUDE A COPY OF
> >>THIS MESSAGE IN YOUR REPLY. �THANK YOU.
> >>
> >>Personal Database Applications
> >>1323 Center Dr.
> >>Auburn, GA �30011-3318 USA
> >>
> >>770-307-1511
> >>770-307-0760 Fax
> >>
> >>Check out our web page! Tell others about it! �Thanks.
> >>
> >>http://www.hosenose.com/
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>LOGic mailing list
> >>[email protected]
> >>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >LOGic mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic