[Logic] Re: ARRL LOTW

[C.M. Christensen]

Yep -- same here. PSK31 works fine but not PSK and as NA5Q mentioned in 
his post I also had trouble with the time. I had a time in the log as 
2408 -- don't quite know how I did that and did not know Logic would 
accept that but it did. Also, I had one call logged with an inadvertent 
comma behind the call. Logic took that but LoTW rejected it. I guess 
LoTW will help us clean up some pilot error in our logs!

I still am not sure how to change all of the USB and LSB in the rest of 
my log to SSB with a mass update so if anyone has some tips on that I 
would appreciate it.
-- 
73,
Chris, AC�M

Greg Hodsdon wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up on the mobile designators.  I now see the
> "-m" format was rejected on the upload.  Luckily my log was in 'SSB'
> format so didn't have any problems there.  However, LoTW will
> not accept PSK.  The correct format is PSK31.
> 
> 73 de Greg, K7KJ
> 
> Portland, OR
> k7kj@arrl.net
> http://www.qsl.net/k7kj
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "C.M. Christensen" <cchrisac0m@cox.net>
> To: <logic@mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 6:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [Logic] Re: ARRL LOTW
> 
> 
> 
>>Howdy all,
>>
>>A couple of other things to watch out for when you convert your Logic
>>log to .ADI and then into LoTW. If you have mobile stations in your log
>>such as AC0M-M it will reject them. AC0M/M works fine but may cause some
>>fits in Logic regarding proper placement of the contact according to the
>>/M designator. Also, watch for CWN and PTOR in the mode column. LoTW
>>wants CW and TOR according to their mode list.
>>
>>I did not experience any difficulty with the select criteria in the
>>Logic header but the USB and LSB thing gave me fits. Wish I could
>>remember how to mass update the log and I would change all of the USB
>>and LSB in my entire log to SSB. Back to the help pages I guess, hi.
>>
>>My question is how are we going to handle confirmations for DXCC etc.,
>>in Logic once LoTW goes live. We are all comfortable with the F, R,
>>etc., in the QSLS and QSLR boxes on the log page and with checking in
>>QSL cards. We will have to keep this information current to maintain our
>>proper totals in Logic but we really won't have a QSL card. Perhaps an
>>additional box on the log page to indicate TQSL confirmation would work
>>but it will have to add into the band, county, mode, etc. totals in Logic.
>>-- 
>>73,
>>Chris, AC�M
>>
>>PDA wrote:
>>
>>>Dear Carl:
>>>
>>>With two minor problems, LOGic appears to
>>>work fine with LOTW.
>>>
>>>The two known problems are
>>>
>>>1).  LOGIc sends USB and LSB instead of
>>>SSB.  I will fix this, but meanwhile fix it with
>>>Notepad.
>>>
>>>2).  The select criterial that LOGic puts in
>>>the header makes LOTW croak.  This is
>>>their fault.  Meanwhile, just delete it with
>>>notepad.
>>>
>>>Let me know if any questions.
>>>
>>>Tnx & 73,
>>>
>>>Dennis WN4AZY
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Dear Dennis,
>>>>
>>>>How are you coming with the subject addition to LOGic?
>>>>
>>>>I see that they are now beta testing.
>>>>
>>>>73, Carl VE9OV
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>================================
>>>WHEN REPLYING, PLEASE INCLUDE A COPY OF
>>>THIS MESSAGE IN YOUR REPLY.  THANK YOU.
>>>
>>>Personal Database Applications
>>>1323 Center Dr.
>>>Auburn, GA  30011-3318 USA
>>>
>>>770-307-1511
>>>770-307-0760 Fax
>>>
>>>Check out our web page! Tell others about it!  Thanks.
>>>
>>>          http://www.hosenose.com/
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>LOGic mailing list
>>>LOGic@mailman.qth.net
>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>LOGic mailing list
>>LOGic@mailman.qth.net
>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> LOGic@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>