[Logic] Latest version of Logic???

Carl Smidt [email protected]
Wed, 9 Jul 2003 08:29:23 -0300


Not wanting to get into a long harangue rojomn, your reply to me is not very
friendly and certainly most discourteous.

After an e-mail has been resent several times with new comments, it becomes
quite easy to lose sight of the originator of each message and
then seeing a 'signature' below leads to false conclusions.

Everyone else on this list has the courtesy to sign their messages with a 73
or Regards and a name and call sign.

What are you trying to hide?????

Your reply to my message to you (see below), leaving my 'signature' below it
and not yours, is an insult and very rude.

Obviously, I know the originator of a message by looking at the header, but
I still don't know who "me" is and I don't really care.

Just don't let my 'signature' follow any of your comments in the future,
thank you.


Carl   VE9OV

P.S. I will be away until Saturday.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "rojomn" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Logic] Latest version of Logic???


> At 07:37 PM 7/8/2003, you wrote:
> >Hello "rojomn",
> >
> >I wish that you would sign your e-mails my friend. Your response to mine
> >makes it look, to the casual observer, like they could be my comments,
> >since it ends with my, "73,    Carl   VE9OV"
>
>
> Then HOW did you know it was me. When I originate a message it is signed.
> When I reply, it just gets what it has.
>
> >Regards,   Carl   VE9OV
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>