[Logic] Latest version of Logic???

[Carl Smidt]

Hello "rojomn",

I wish that you would sign your e-mails my friend. Your response to mine
makes it look, to the casual observer, like they could be my comments,
since it ends with my, "73,    Carl   VE9OV"

Regards,   Carl   VE9OV

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "rojomn" <rojomn@charter.net>
To: <logic@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Logic] Latest version of Logic???


> At 02:55 PM 7/8/2003, you wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >Have you chaps tried to call and talk with Dennis directly on this
subject?
> >Or even send him an e-mail.
>
> I have, and he usually responds quickly.
>
>
>
>
> >I have NEVER had my e-mails go "unanswered" and I have been a LOGic user
> >since the early DOS days.
>
>
> Nor have I.
>
> >If you chaps want to have something included in a future update of the
> >program, contact Dennis directly and if it is possible it will be done,
> >sooner or later, quite often sooner.
>
> I can't agree here. Dennis is the first and last god on what happens to
> Logic. that is his right though.
> I don't mean to say he does not listen and perhaps get some ideas from the
> group but he has to like it or it does not happen.
>
>
>
>
> >If he is reticent about adding software update version numbers on his FTP
> >site, he obviously has a very good reason for it. Ask him and he will let
> >you know his reasons.
>
>
> He has been asked and he has not responded to this. I don't know why. I
> think there is a block in his mid on this one. Oh well, better this than
> actual program trouble.
> He has obviously seen this discussion, and could respond if he wished. The
> main probable reason ,in my opinion, is that he does not want to do it but
> has no reasonable explanation of why he should not. I am ready and willing
> to listen to a reasonable logical explanation.
>
>
>
> >73,   Carl   VE9OV