[Logic] Email List Etiquette

Ron Jones [email protected]
Thu, 14 Aug 2003 11:34:02 -0600


Hi Skip,
         Perhaps your example of a comment with no real value was not a 
good example - "thanks, that worked" contains tons of useful valuable 
information to those of us who have been following a thread. But, your 
point is well taken. We should try to convey useful information to the group.

73 and keep us on track, Skip!

Ron  K7RJ


At 01:10 PM 8/14/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi Skip:
>I can see your point, but on the other hand the term "Value" is rather 
>subjective.
>
>Sometimes when someone posts a problem on this list, it may be helpful to 
>another
>person having the same problem to get some feedback like "Thanks, that worked"
>before implementing changes on their computer.
>
>I look at this list as a "Great Resource"It and have almost all of the 
>messages on
>this list since 1998 saved on my computer.  If I have a question, I can search
>the previous messages for a solution.  I see no need to "Reinvent the Wheel".
>
>CTRL-D works fine on unwanted messages.  I get 500 to 900 email messages a 
>day and
>use it when needed.
>
>73
>Bob, K1VU
>
>
>At 11:00 8/14/2003 , you wrote:
> >Email List Etiquette:
> >Seems to me that it would be more appropriate for folks who send a 
> message or
> >comment which has no real value to the rest of us, in response to one with
> >substance, to send it directly to the originator and not to the entire list.
> >
> >I am referring to comments like "I get it now", "Thanks, that worked", 
> "that was the
> >problem", etc. which merely fills up my inbox with more messages to delete.
> >
> >Thanks for considering this.
> >It just might keep and attract folks to this list.
> >
> >Skip W5GAI
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >LOGic mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>
>_______________________________________________
>LOGic mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic