[Logic] ADMIN: Rejected Messages

Mon, 28 Jan 2002 20:50:59 -0500

George,

Tnx for reply. I'm curious...

My rejections were all for attempts to reply to a message received through
LOGic reflector.
Reason for rejection was "Suspicious Header".
Here's text:

"Your mail to 'LOGic' with the subject

    Yaesu Rotator Connector Wiring Diagram

Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.

The reason it is being held:

    Message has a suspicious header

Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the moderator's decision"

George, no attachment was included.
My mail was/is set to send in plain text.
I believe my member address is OK.
There were never more than two addresses in Address Line, one of which is
this reflector.
My message was short: "Rich, I posted a scanned page of your rotator's
connector wiring diagram on my web site.  Go to www.k1uq.com then K1UQ Home,
and in the table, click on Antennas. 73,  Bill  K1UQ"

Ideas anyone??

Bill  K1UQ

----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 9:58 AM
Subject: [Logic] ADMIN: Rejected Messages

> Gentlemen,
>
> Just a reminder about messages that are rejected by this list.
> This is not a change from our previous policy, but the rejection notices
> that you receive are different, and seem to be causing some confusion.
>
> Messages That Are Rejected
>
> 1).  HTML, RTF or other encoded, stylized formats.
>
>        You must adjust the settings on your email client to send messages
> in plain text only!
>
>        If you are unsure of how to do this, the following web site is an
> excellent resource:
>
>        http://www.nethawk.com/1113/swap/nohtml.htm
>
> 2).  Attachments of any kind.  Period.
>
> 3).  Non-member addresses.
>
>        The address from which you send messages must be exactly the same
> address under which you are subscribed.   This means that if you had a
> receive-only alias added to the list, your messages will probably not go
> through, as your actual post will be coming from another address.  If you
> subscribe from a home address and send from a work address, the same thing
> will happen.  If you change addresses and your old address forwards mail
to
> your new address, but you send from your new address -- same thing.
>
> You may subscribe more than one address and then set one of them to
> "nomail," if you need to have a second address.
>
> 4).  Too many addresses in the CC:  or  BCC:  lines.
>
>         This is an anti-spam feature.
>
> 5).  Large messages, over 30K
>
>         This is also an anti-spam measure and protects the list from
> unnecessarily large posts, such as someone resending an entire digest or
> forwarding other material.  If you really need to send something over that
> limit, please contact me, and I can get it through  -- IF it seems
> legitimate for the whole list.
>
> 6).  Administrative Requests:
>
>        Requests to be unsubscribed or have an address changed, etc. will
> generally be rejected by the system.  Some may slip through, but we do our
> best to get these filtered out.  No one enjoys receiving someone else's
> request for administrative help.  DO NOT send these to the list
> address!  HINT:  There is a clickable link in the header of each message
> that will take you to the unsubscription page.  Just click!
>
> We expect everyone to be responsible for managing his own
> subscription.  Mailman actually makes this quite easy.  Take the time to
> read and SAVE the welcome message and information document.  If you need a
> refresher, please send a message to the following address and use the
> information to take care of yourself:
>
> [email protected]
>
> 7).  Test Messages
>
>        Although Mailman is not set to reject these automatically, I
reserve
> the right to unsubscribe anyone who does this.  Why should you annoy
> everyone on the list with a useless test message?  It is as rude as tuning
> up on someone's operating frequency.  If you have something to say, just
> send the message to the list; you'll get all the information you need from
> doing that as you would from sending, broadcasting, "Test, test, test!"
>
> 8).  Flames
>
>        Again, Mailman cannot filter these out, but as moderator, I will
> deal with these.   Anyone who engages in inappropriate personal comments,
> or who is otherwise abusive or inappropriate on the list may be removed,
> and may be banned, at my sole discretion.  My general philosophy is to
have
> a free and open discussion;  debate and vigorous give-and-take is to be
> expected -- but, it must always be on an objective level as a mature
> discussion and never descend to the level of personal attack.  I am
> reluctant to take drastic action, but will do so to preserve the integrity
> of this list.
>
> If you feel someone has been inappropriate in messages sent to the list,
> please send your complaint to me directly and NOT to the list, or even to
> the perceived offender.  I appreciate alerts from other members as I am
not
> always able to read each message in a timely manner.
>
> - - - -
>
> HELP:   If you have done all you can to resolve any problem pertaining to
> your list operation, please contact me individually, and I'll do my best
to
> resolve your problem.  Remember that all moderators on the qth.net system
> are volunteers.  You can always reach the moderator by sending a message
> to:   [email protected]
>
> 73,
> George K3GV
> Moderator
>
> DX: Long may it live !
> If it isn't LOGic it isn't LOGging !
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>