[Logic] Spot Log Appearances

Mon, 2 Dec 2002 06:40:41 -0800

And I fifth it....

73 de WQ7A

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stephen J. Schrack" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 6:17 AM
Subject: RE: [Logic] Spot Log Appearances

> I fourth it...
> 
> 73 de N3MX
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Gil Baron
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 9:03 AM
> To: [email protected]; PDA
> Subject: RE: [Logic] Spot Log Appearances
> 
> And I third it.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On
> > Behalf Of Carl Smidt
> > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 7:38 AM
> > To: [email protected]; PDA
> > Subject: Re: [Logic] Spot Log Appearances
> > 
> > 
> > I second this request.
> > 
> > 73,   Carl   VE9OV
> >   ----- Original Message ----- 
> >   From: Ben Hatheway 
> >   To: PDA 
> >   Cc: [email protected] 
> >   Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 11:30 PM
> >   Subject: [Logic] Spot Log Appearances
> > 
> > 
> >   Dennis:
> > 
> >   In your release notes, you indicate:
> > 
> >   >6.0.127 BETA
> > 
> >   >The spot log now displays spots in reverse chronological order 
> > based on the time received, not the timestamp from the webcluster.
> > 
> >   Not sure this change is better, especially when using 
> > webcluster. When loading 25 at a time, the latest spot posted for 
> > a given station,  which may contain needed updated information 
> > about that posted spot, can sometimes be found in the center of 
> > the group instead of the top where it used to be. Before, the 
> > latest posts were at the top of the list. Now I have to take the 
> > time to look down at each of the spots and their corresponding 
> > timestamps to be sure that I have the latest information about a 
> > particular station, since his frequency may have changed, or he 
> > is listening on a different frequency. This takes more time and I 
> > have to scroll to the appropriate spot to assure that the rig 
> > will go to the correct frequency. I have missed some spots, or 
> > clicked on some higher in the list only to have the rig go to an 
> > incorrect frequency because he QSY's 
> > 
> >   I guess I can see this in a radio packet cluster environment, 
> > but when retrieving up to 250 spots at a time, which can happen, 
> > or only 25, it makes it more difficult to land the correct DX contact.
> 
> > 
> >   I hope you will consider changing this back, or making it a 
> > setup option...
> > 
> >   thanks
> > 
> >   Ben Hatheway
> > 
> >   N6FM
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> >   multipart/alternative
> >     text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >     text/html
> >   The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> >   or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
> >   Please post in Plain-Text only.---
> >   _______________________________________________
> >   LOGic mailing list
> >   [email protected]
> >   http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> > 
> > 
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> > multipart/alternative
> >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >   text/html
> > The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> > or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
> > Please post in Plain-Text only.---
> > _______________________________________________
> > LOGic mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
> 