[Laser] Polarization Subtraction
Tim Toast
toasty256 at yahoo.com
Fri Oct 19 00:48:56 EDT 2012
More about the camera and adapting the concept to optical comms.
At first i thought of the rotating or electronically switched
(LCD)filters too but i guess it's not that complicated really.
At least in the case of this special camera. Just a lens + plane
beam splitter with two fixed polarization filters at right angles
and two CCD's in their camera.
The scheme appears to work over whatever the exposure time they
used to take the photo's, 1/1000th to 1/10th a second or so. I
suspect in the case of our optical comms, with photodiodes instead
of CCD's, it would work continuously, with the two polarized
signals being continuously subtracted in real time. And with
enough signal to make the loss in light level tolerable due to
the splitter (-3 dB?) and the filters (-4 or -5dB ?) I think some
only let 30 percent of the light through. It seems that this could
not work with very weak signals. It could be that this thing is
only usefull in fog with moderate optical signals - wouldn't that
be strange?!
It may be that the path length from the single lens optic to the
focal points of both beams are important. With a plane ordinary
beam splitter, the beams are going to be exactly the same
length assuming the photodiodes are positioned well enough
- normally within a millimeter or so either side of the focal
point. I think light travels about a foot per nanosecond. So the
two beams would be well within that distance. There would need to
be a whole foot difference in the path length to have a one
nanosecond difference in arival times for the photons. This is
very - very simultaneous! A few millimeters of light travel time
- juat a few picoseconds.
Not that the polarization in the scene is changing at ultra fast
rates but if it were, this capture device should still get a
"temporal frame of any length" nearly simultaneously - within
a few picoseconds. I think most of the polarization info is
almost static anyway and not changing very fast other than
being jumbled around a bit by the air pockets or cells that
cause scintillation sometimes. The fog or haze is scattering the
light photons randomly but is it scattering the polarization
angles too? Or is it affecting the scene polarizations in other
ways? IDK. Maybe the polarization info in the image or scene is
not affected by scattering fog at all. Meanwhile, the degree
of simultaneousness in the camera exceeds all that by an
enormous amount.
-toast
More information about the Laser
mailing list