[Laser] daytime optical contacts

[MICHAEL COUTURE]

Hi Stuart,

Thanks for the update. I am trying to pull little tid-bits here and there out of 
the various articles I see to use on mine.

Mike C.
(sandbar W. FL)




________________________________
From: Stuart <stuart.wisher at talktalk.net>
To: laser at mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thu, August 25, 2011 11:35:06 AM
Subject: [Laser] daytime optical contacts

Hello Tim,


Sorry it has been a while again since I last "chipped in". I have been busy on 
the "UKnanowaves" Yahoo group which I see you have joined as well.


Ok on all your comments, The wavelength mismatch doe not seem to be a problem 
for the LEDs I am using. They are at least 30nm wide bandwidth, that is probably 
why. The effect will probably be much narrower with lasers, but I know it has 
been made to work in the past.


The big gain as you recognise with my LED transceiver is the use of a single 
optical system for both receive and transmit. I do not feel the need for duplex, 
as what we have just works like normal simplex amateur radio, so no need for a 
multiplex system. There is a small delay when you go back to receive as it takes 
a few ms to charge the LED up to 43V reverse bias anyway, with big capacitors on 
the decoupling you can see and hear the signal coming up as the optimum voltage 
is approached.. Plus on simplex, there is a nice opportunity to optimise the 
alignment on receive as your QSO partner talks, in the knowledge that you will 
also put a better signal out on transmit when your turn comes.


We are just about to try a contact over a 46km path close to local noon, and in 
addition we are going to try not to use any visible beacon or strobe to line up 
to start with, although we will use the optical beacons if that does not work 
out. We will be treating the contact rather like a rather narrow beamwidth 
microwave contact (current beamwidth of our system is 0.3 degrees in total). I 
am also going to trial an iris plate attenuator provided we make contact, I can 
drop both RX and TX signals by 6dB or 12dB by reducing the aperture. I am hoping 
this will give us a guide re further range possibilities. I will let you know 
how we get on.


Stuart, G8CYW



______________________________________________________________
Laser mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/laser
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Laser at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html