[Laser] Re: Lasers vs LEDs & ARRL contests
Clint Turner
turner at ussc.com
Sat Jul 19 11:56:39 EDT 2008
Hi Art,
Actually, there are a number of reasons why, in practice, the LED worked
better than the laser - but, surprisingly, "beam wander" isn't really
the main one, although I have observed that phenomenon with lasers if
the aim put the receiver on the "ragged edge."
You might find interesting this paper on that very subject:
http://modulatedlight.org/Dollars_vesus_Decibels_colour.pdf
On the web site: http://modulatedlight.org
There are other resources at this same web site that you might find
interesting as well. (Yes, I had something to do with this site...)
73,
Clint
KA7OEI
> Clint,
>
> Do you have any idea why the LED worked better???
>
> The only thing I can think of is that the laser had a narrow beam and
> the atmospheric conditions shifted the beam in and out of alignment
> with the target. The LED had a wider beam, so minor shifting didn't
> make much difference.
>
> But, the erp has to be way down on the LED-even a few degrees of
> beamwidth makes the LED very weak at the receiver.
>
> Any idea why the LED worked better?
>
> Art
>
>
More information about the Laser
mailing list