[Laser] Lasers vs LEDs & ARRL contests
Kerry Banke
kbanke at sbcglobal.net
Sat Jul 19 11:29:39 EDT 2008
Here is my input on the subject of using optical communications during ARRL contests.
I don't think that light spectrum width or coherency should be specified at all. With the gear I have put together over time, I can send text transmissions using the Jason software many, many miles LOS via High Preasure Sodium lamp, Mercury Vapor lamp, Incanescent lamp, and even the filament glow of an 813 transmitter tube . This is done by FM modulating the AC power frequency used to excite those light sources in the 65 Hz range. The more powerful of these sources work well for NLOS transmissions over several miles using forward scatter. Technical challenge is something I have always seen as being a big part of Amateur Radio and I believe it should not be stifled. I do believe some form of minimum modulation requirement may well serve to eliminate the concern for the blinking flashlight contact. I see no need to limit the optical light source at all as I my gear can do the same text transmissions via laser or LED as well as those other sources mentioned.
73 - Kerry Banke - N6IZW with the San Diego Microwave Group
More information about the Laser
mailing list