[Laser] Lasers vs LEDs & ARRL contests
GeoffK
gkrauss at stny.rr.com
Fri Jul 18 23:00:13 EDT 2008
Geoff WA2GFP, having done Lasercomms intermittently over the last 25+
years, responds:
> rule 1.12 that states "1.12. Above 300 GHz, contacts are permitted for
> contest
> credit only:
a) > between licensed amateurs using
GFP: these are rules for use during an Amateur Radio contest, so the
contacts should be between licensed hams (you want to be in this contest,
you gotta be part of the group, otherwise we have no way to keep Joe Ham's
unlicensed family, friends, dog, etc. from showing up in the log)
b) > coherent radiation on transmission (for example, laser)
GFP: how many of you were active in the later 70s/early '80s, when lasers
were expensive and some folks used ligth bulbs in VHF contests? >> this led
[ no pun!] to the requirement for 'coherence', which is one practical way to
eliminate bulbs, and, IMHO, LEDs etc. which are not particularly spectrally
clean. I'm not an Optical Physicist, but LEDs are not coherent (nor are some
types of lasers below certain thresholds!) Certainly, any source of
broad-sprctrum radiation, like white light, can not coherent with known
technology. We no longer use broad-spectrum HF, like spark, etc. becasuw it
is no State-of-the-Art (SOTA); we should not be going against the trend of
technology by allowing broad-spectrum emissions even above 300 GHz., where
there are usable narrow-spectrum (one present definition of 'soherent')
available.
and
c) >employing at least one stage of electronic detection on receive."
GFP: eliminates the reception by eyeball of lightbulbs, etc.
>. How coherent is coherent ?
GFP: How spectrally-clean are modern HF, VHF,UHF transmitters? Why do we
have transmitters with IMD of 30-35 dm, when commercial transmitters with
IMD3 at -50 db. or better are quite possible? In the latter situation, it is
a question of how much the manufacturer wants to spend to meet a
coherence-IMD spec (and most hams will not pay for -50db at 100 watts, or,
as better put, using sufficient feedback to achieve -50db. would make the
output power 20W and that is not going to sell! Since there are few
commercial ham lasercomm products, and none that I know of that have serious
performance, this is not manufacturer drive.
So, what level of coherence does ARRL want to legislate into the contest
rules?
How do they want to have this level tested such that a contester can
show compliance (and, since every contest brings at least one complaint abut
splatter, IMD or other transmitted 'garbage', why do they NOT do that for
any other band????)
More information about the Laser
mailing list