[Laser] Lunar downlink - 100m error
TWOSIG at aol.com
TWOSIG at aol.com
Thu Feb 23 21:18:14 EST 2006
I think that (once again) I have used too many words to describe what seems
to me to be a simple situation, and therefore failed to communicate.
I think the 100m error in the location of the Lick Observatory telescope
caused the team to point the telescope in the wrong direction.
The telescope would have been used to observe objects in the sky and would
have been very precisely calibrated, with reference to the sky. To calculate
the angle to point the telescope at the location of the retroreflector on
Moon, the team would have used the latitude and longitude ( now known to be in
error by 100m ) to define a point in the sky, in essence drawing a line from
the center of the Earth to the telescope. The telescope would then have been
pointed into the sky relative to that. The angular error caused by a 100m
error on the surface of the Earth is about 3.2 arcseconds ( or about 15.7
micro-radians). The pointing error would result in an error of about 6,000 meters
at the Moon, since it is about 60 Earth radii away.
This is speculation on my part. However it seems much more likely than a
problem with a pulse gate that was too narrow. The purpose of the activity was
to verify that they could detect the laser pulses, not to refine the
distance measurement. If the problem had been the gate, then they could have found
the problem by widening the gate or shifting it a small amount. The way the
story is told, they didn't detect the beam and then figure out that the
co-ordinates were wrong. They corrected the co-ordinates, then detected the beam.
On the number of photons captured - please note that there is a new, larger
telescope, coupled with a stronger laser pulse than was used by the west Texas
program for the last three decades. This new instrument goes by the
nickname Apollo, and has only been used for a few months.
James
N5GUI
More information about the Laser
mailing list