[Laser] Re: PSK31 via light - up-convert to RF vs audio amp
Kerry Banke
kbanke at qualcomm.com
Wed Aug 9 19:16:35 EDT 2006
I see two possible issues with this concept based on my own
experience. The noise of the photodiode increases with light level
so adding a strong enough light LO source to cause non-linear mixing
might bring up the noise considerably. Also going for an RF
frequency response requires the diode to now be terminated in a low
impedance which reduces the sensitivity way below that achievable
with the audio frequency, very high impedance, K3PGP design. In the
end it may be about the same as directly sending RF modulated
light. Just my 2 cents worth.
- Kerry N6IZW -
At 03:17 PM 8/9/2006, you wrote:
> >From toasty256 at yahoo.com :
>
> >One more thought on this conversion to RF thing. The
> >ultimate in low noise mixing might be using the
> >photodiode itself as the mixer.
>
>
>Hmmm. Very interesting thoughts. If the path was without phase
>distortion ( like a satellite to satellite link ) you could use
>a laser for the "Local
>Oscillator" and get lots of bandwidth. A path in air would result in so
>much de-coherence that I do not see how you would get anything but noise.
>
>As you suggest, an RF modulated light source might result in a mixed signal
>that a receiver might handle without adding much internal noise.
>
>A sine wave would probably be less likely to have noise that would interfere
>with the desired signal. However, even a asymetric square wave might also
>serve since the harmonic content of pulsed light would be rejected by the
>receiver. Amplitude modulation near the signal frequency would be more of a
>problem.
>
>
>Thank you for you thoughts.
>
>James
>N5GUI
>_______________________________________________
>Laser mailing list
>Laser at mailman.qth.net
>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/laser
More information about the Laser
mailing list