[Laser] Re: Fresnel lenses and dispersal angle
KY1K
ky1k at pivot.net
Thu Jun 16 13:54:07 EDT 2005
Hi Chris,
All ok, except......
>So, to your calculated dispersal, you have to ADD the 'inaccuracy factor',
>which depends on the quality of your particular lens. I've noticed that
>early fresnels, such as those in 1960s 'Overhead' transparency projectors
>are not corrected for spherical aberration, in many cases. This would
>exacerbate things further.
For those using lasers and LED's, spherical aberration is our friend, not
an enemy........... The fact a fresnel or an early overhead projector lens
is NOT corrected makes them desirable, not the other way around.
Spherical aberration is the uniformity of the focal length of the lens as
the wavelength of the light is varied.
This is used to our benefit, because it is wavelength selective and tends
to prevent light from undesired wavelengths from reaching the detector.
Let's say your system is optimized for red. A blue or near IR photon will
reach the detector in lower quantity because some of the off wavelength's
will miss the detector due to the variable focal length of the lens for
these different colors.
If your receiver is only interested in a small portion of the visible
spectrum, you should strive for optics that are not corrected for spherical
aberration, not the other way around.
An uncoated glass lens offers no correction for spherical aberration, and
should be used rather than a coated lens.
Art
More information about the Laser
mailing list