[Laser] Riflescope, Telescope, Eyepiece, One Pixel Camera
TWOSIG at aol.com
TWOSIG at aol.com
Sun Nov 7 20:15:51 EST 2004
To add to my previous comments about using a telescope in a light
communication system, I would like to bring to your attention the technique of eyepiece
projection. It is commonly used to observe sunspots, by moving the eyepiece
further away from the objective lens than would be used when people look through
the telescope.
I stated before that when the eyepiece is adjusted for normal viewing, the
image is focused at infinity. If you move the eyepiece further away from the
virtual image from the telescope objective, then the real image from the
eyepiece moves closer.
If you are using the technique to observe sunspots, the size of the image of
the sun (and its spots) is bigger the further away the image is. It is also
less bright. There is the additional problem that on a telescope that is not
clock driven to synchronize its motion with the Sun the image will move out of
the field of view much faster.
The adjustments that provide a large image when observing sunspots translates
into narrow field of view on a communication system. Narrow field of view
means better signal to noise (same signal, less noise) but more difficulty
performing alignment. Brightness is not an issue. As long as your light source is
small enough to be considered a point source, it will still result in a point
image, with all the light energy in that point. However, atmospheric
disturbance to the path may cause the point image to miss a small detector. This
would probably seem like severe scintilation (like the twinkling of stars).
De-focus so the "image" of the point source is larger than the detector might
help image jump caused by atmospherics, but it will not affect scintilation, and
it comes at the price of less light energy on the detector. If you have
excess signal to noise, it may be worth the trade.
James
N5GUI
More information about the Laser
mailing list