[Laser] Laser comm and ARRL?
[email protected]
[email protected]
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:09:37 EST
Geoff is referring to the threads on the reflector
[email protected]
He is correct that anyone on this reflector who wants to see laser contacts
continue to be counted in VHF contests should be sending comments.
The threads started with this message:
To VHF+ contesters:
For the last year or so the ARRL has been studying ways to increase interest
and participation in VHF+ contests (and awards). It was a good sign that
participation was up in last June's VHF QSO Party, and we're looking to encourage
more participation, especially those who have multi-band transceivers.
Our recommendations had several basic goals. Changes to the contest rules
and awards programs should:
1) encourage more people to work more other people
2) encourage QSOs made over longer distances
3) encourage more people to join in and participate
Major recommendations
1) Changes in the rover rules
2) QSO point changes
3) June VHF QSO Party 50-1296 only
4) New categories in Jan/Jun/Sept
5) Expanded Microwave contest based on 10 GHz Cumulative - UHF contest
dropped.
These major recommendations, and a number of minor ones, are still just
recommendations. We felt it would be important to have further input from the VHF+
contest community at this point.
After you've had a chance to read through and think about the proposed
changes, we'd like to hear from you. Please send any comments to
[email protected] - we'd like to have your input by March 7th.
January VHF SS and June/September VHF QSO Parties
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
1) Change Rover Rules
After considerable discussion about the impact of the present rover rules and
comments from both rovers and non-rovers, we have recommended reverting to
the rover scoring rules originally established in 1991. The text of the
original rule is "The final score consists of the total number of QSO points from all
bands times the total number of multipliers from all grid squares in which
they operated." This change would encourage rovers to go to rarer and more
distant grids instead of staying closer to metropolitan areas.
Because rover scores can be so large under the original rover scoring rules,
they can distort the club competition scores. To solve this major problem
with the original rules, we propose that rover station scores should not be
counted towards club competition scores. Rovers would continue to contribute
substantially to increasing the scores of club members by providing numerous QSO
points and activating new grids.
Finally, we believe it is time to be more definitive and state unequivocally
that grid circling and captive roving are highly undesirable practices and
that no rover station should engage in them. We recognize that due to the great
disparities in population and geography, hard and fast analytical tests for
these activities may not be possible but both these practices are well
understood.
Grid circling has been observed quite clearly under both the original and
present rover rules two or more rovers congregate at the intersection of four
grid squares and then circle each other around that corner making short distance
QSOs with each other. Operating practices that look like grid circling are
easy to detect and will result in review of the log by the contest managers.
The term "captive rover" refers to stations whose primary activity is to
increase the score of one fixed station either single operator or multi-operator,
and who never, or seldom, work anyone else in the contest. These may or may
not be people who are part of the same team or group. Again, this is easy to
detect during the log checking process and will attract the attention of the
contest manager.
2) QSO Point changes
The current rules provide for increasing QSO points as contacts are made on
higher bands plus additional multipliers on each band for each new grid. We
propose to change the values for QSO points for all three contests. Regardless
of band you would receive two points for QSOs with your own grid and any
adjacent grid, and three points for each QSO beyond that. QSOs with rover stations
would count one QSO point each, regardless of distance.
This change would reward those who can make more distant QSOs, and it would
make a volume of short range microwave QSOs somewhat less critical to the final
score although microwave grid multipliers would still be crucial to an all
band entry. It would also tend to make QSOs with casual participants and
newcomers more appealing than constantly running from band to band.
3) June VHF QSO Party 50-1296 MHz only
It seemed to us that at least one of the "big three" VHF+ contests ought to
emphasize the VHF bands. We thus recommend that the June VHF QSO Party be
limited to 50-1296 MHz only. June is often the time for sporadic E openings on 6
meters - as was the case in 2003. We would discontinue the Limited Multi
category in the June VHF QSO Party only.
4) New categories in Jan/Jun/Sept
Getting started in VHF+ contesting can be a bit daunting, and we wanted to
find ways to attract the many people who have purchased multi-band transceivers
that include VHF bands like the IC-706 and others.
We recommend the establishment of a new Limited Single Operator category
designed with the newcomer in mind - 50-144-432 MHz only, with low power operation
only. For those who are "real estate challenged" because of antenna
restrictions or topography, we also recommend a new 6-hour QRP Hilltopper category.
This latter category should also be appealing to QRPers with radios like the
FT817, one of the more rapidly growing segments in Amateur Radio.
5) Other recommended changes (Jan/Jun/Sept)
a) Simplify the limit for low power operation to 150w for 50-144-222-432
MHz.
b) Allow DX-to-DX contacts for QSO point and multiplier credit, but the
DX station must make at least one QSO
with W/VE on each band for which QSOs are submitted.
c) Eliminate the rules that allow Multi-Operator stations to work their
own operators on 2.3G and up.
d) Offer plaques for the January and September contests, in addition to
June. Work to find individual, club or corporate
sponsors. Otherwise offer plaques to national and regional
leaders at cost.
e) Make sure the rules indicate certificates are awarded for low power
entries in January, and for top DX entries.
f) Resume promoting suggested times and frequencies for "activity hours"
on each band.
New Microwave contest based on 10 GHz Cumulative - UHF contest dropped
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
We recommend expanding the format of the successful 10G and Up microwave
contest and expand it to cover from 2.3 GHz and up. The August UHF Contest
would be discontinued after 2004. It never reached a critical mass of support and
entries.
1) Add one more weekend in April or May to the existing two-weekend
cumulative contest.
2) Include 2.3G, 3.4G and 5.7G bands.
3) Have four basic categories - 2.4/3.4/5.7G, 10G only, 10G and up, and
all band (2.4G and up). Each major category would
include portable and home-based categories.
4) Perhaps call them the X-band contests to increase interest.
EME Contest
-----------------
1) The Contest department should work to establish the dates for the EME
contest weekends as early as possible,
and include them with the contest calendar as the yearly
summary is released.
2) Change the multiplier to include US states and Canadian provinces
instead of call areas. The report remains the signal report.
3) Drop the requirement that stations operating outside of their
traditional call area sign with a portable designation.
Changes Already Implemented
-------------------------------------
1) Allow digital QSOs in the EME contest. Implemented for 2003 contest.
2) Work to establish an Internet template for entry of small and medium
sized logs. Implemented in January 2004.
3) Add a club competition to the June VHF QSO Party. Implemented for
2003 contest.
4) Work to find good authors and to encourage more regional reporting of
VHF+ contest results. This had been in place for more
than a year now. Staff is working hard to identify authors
and would welcome volunteers, particularly experienced contesters
5) Encourage Logbook of The World development to be supportive of VHF+
awards, like the VUCC. Implemented in September 2003.
6) Encourage more activity by developing a high-quality grid square map
of the United States. A very nice laminated, color grid
square map covering North America was released in June 2003.
Awards
----------
1) Change the entry-level steps for VHF+ awards so more people will be
able to get started in the VUCC, WAS and DXCC
using VHF+ frequencies. Consider changing the steps for
different level awards to a smaller increment.
2) Establish a VUCC challenge-type award, similar to the one used by
DXCC.
3) Create a new award or awards to appeal to entry-level or
rover/portable operation, such as a grids activated or miles per
watt award. Consider GCR certification rather than card
checking.
4) For VUCC awards on 50 through 1296 MHz and Satellite, all contacts
must be made from a location or locations within the
same grid locator or locations in different grid locators no
more than 200 kilometers apart [the approximate distance between
the corners of a grid square]. (Currently they have to be made
from the same grid square or from distances no more than
50 miles apart.)
How we got here
---------------------
The number of logs submitted to ARRL VHF+ contests has generally been
decreasing for several years and the perception is that activity is not increasing in
spite of the advent of commercial HF/VHF/UHF radios. After a number of
discussions, ARRL Board members voted (January 2002) to have the Membership
Services Committee review the existing VHF, UHF, and Microwave contest and awards
programs and make recommendations on ways to increase interest and participation.
The MSC established a subcommittee of K1KI N0AX W5ZN and N7NG.
The early work included a survey in September 2002. The survey, intended as
a way to gather ideas, not to measure exact opinion on issues, was a great
success. Some 250 people provide valuable input. Initially, the subcommittee
produced recommended changes for the VHF+ awards. That progress report was given
at the January 2003 meeting of the MSC.
At this point, to increase the expertise relating to the VHF+ contests it was
recommended that the MSC-VHF subcommittee be expanded to include several
knowledgeable VHF+ contesters. The subcommittee was expanded (K1JX K2UA W3ZZ AA7A
KM0T and N1ND were added) and started work in April. Over the past several
months the original discussions were reviewed and new ideas culled from
discussions with friends, from the major VHF+ reflectors and from participating in on
the air contest activity lead to modifications and new recommendations. The
recommendations detailed above are the result of this process.
Again, we'd like to hear from you about the proposed changes. Please send
any comments to [email protected] - we'd like to have your input
by March 7th.
-- Tom Frenaye/K1KI
MSC VHF-UHF Contest and Awards Subcommittee
Tom Frenaye, K1KI, chairman
Clarke Green, K1JX
Joel Harrison, W5ZN
Rus Healy, K2UA* (Atlantic Division Contest Advisory Committee member)
Mike King, KM0T
Wayne Mills, N7NG (Membership Services Department manager)
Ward Silver, N0AX (Northwest Division CAC member)
Ned Stearn, AA7A (Southwest Division CAC member)
Gene Zimmerman, W3ZZ (also QST VHF column editor)
Dan Henderson, N1ND (Contest Department manager)
* unable to participate for the last few months
=====
e-mail: [email protected] ARRL New England Division Director
http://www.arrl.org/
Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---