[Laser] One way 3 mile laser NLOS contact using PSK31
Kerry Banke
kbanke at qualcomm.com
Wed Dec 15 10:25:21 EST 2004
Andy - I was about to request the frequency flexibility & am glad to see
you're going to look at that. I much rather be able to work in the 70-100
Hz range. I currently don't have a pair of field laptops with enough
horsepower to run LaserScatter well but am working on that. That's really
the reason I went with PSK31 for initial tests since I have plenty of
signal at the three mile mark. We'll soon have two complete sets of laser
Tx/Rx hardware capable of operating with LaserScatter.
- Kerry N6IZW -
At 09:08 PM 12/14/2004, Andrew T. Flowers, K0SM wrote:
>Art,
>This is pretty much behind the idea of "LaserScatter" (yes, from the
>makers of RainScatter!). Basically you do very large FFT windows to get
>the frequency resolution required for this kind of work. I'm not a big
>fan of things like QRSS or DFCW for laser work since we have the ability
>to modulate multiple frequencies, and we don't have the drift problem at
>RF. They turn out to be relatively inefficient codes in that respect.
>I'll try to work on the code over Christmas break to make it a bit more
>user (and experimenter) friendly. I have been talking with F1AVY about
>the the what frequencies are best with regard to the PGP receiver and
>various FETs. Turns out this can be anywhere between 0 and 100 Hz
>depending on things like drain-to-gate impedence (think gigaohms) and the
>capacitance of the diode. Given the black magic involved I'll try to make
>the code flexible so that you can find your own "sweet spot" for your
>particular setup.
>
>Wouldn't .0001Hz resolution require something on the order of 1 ppm at
>100Hz? Do you need a TCXO in your soundcard?
More information about the Laser
mailing list