[Laser] Tutorial.
Zack Widup
[email protected]
Fri, 4 Jan 2002 08:38:16 -0600 (CST)
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Steve Schear wrote:
>
> There is a Constitutional mechanism for changes in the basic laws of our
> nation, it called an amendment. The founders made the amendment process
> intentionally difficult because such changes should be undertaken with only
> the most serious consideration. By turning a key passage of the
> Constitution on its head, through creative "re-interpretation", bypassing
> the requirement for an amendment and creating an end-run on limits to
> Federal authority is tyranny and the results unconstitional. Plain and
> simple. Might as well not even have a Constitution. Become like Britain
> where there are no firmly established limits to government authority and
> your rights are only what Parliament deems them to be at any particular time.
>
> steve
>
We're rapidly approaching that point, if not there already. Like a
slingshot, we might just fly past it into a real tyranny.
When YOUR house is surrounded by 500 soldiers with state-of-the-art
weapons (see the weapons parade at the cnn.com website) who don't care
what you think, say or do, there isn't a whole lot you're going to be able
to do.
Better stock up on those 15-watt lasers.
"The price of freedom: constant alertness, constant willingness to fight
back. There is no other price."
73, Zack W9SZ
P.S. This whole thread started when the list was asked for advice about a
15-watt laser. Being pragmatic, I'm curious why someone would need such
power for a laser comm system. I've had fairly reliable QSO's over 5 mile
distances with 3 mW and a very crude system with a receiver which I'd
liken to a "crystal set" for HF reception. Nowhere near the quality of
some equipment I've seen on peoples' websites. I have a couple 10-15 mW
HeNe lasers and a 100 mW IR laser diode I've yet to play around with. I
figure with a decent system, collimated beam and Fresnel lens or reflector
receiver, I could be in the 25-50 mile category on a clear day.