[Lafayette] HE-30/HE-10 correction needed

[Michael Clarson]

And the HE-10 had a real BFO, not a regenerative IF stage. The S-meter on
the HE-10 was a "real" meter -- not a hard to read edgewise meter.
Interesting that the HE-10 was marketed more as a kit (KT-200, I believe)
while the HE-30 was offered more in the wired version, although kit version
was available. Big issue with the HE-10 was it LOOKED like an S-38, but was
a much better rcvr. Many thought it was a "Japanese knockoff" of the S-38.
Both were a bit drifty on the highest frequency band. --Mike, WV2ZOW


On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Klezmer--- via Lafayette <
lafayette at mailman.qth.net> wrote:

>  A correction is needed to the post describing the HE-10 vs. HE-30,
> wherein the poster wrote that the HE-10 & HE-30 were essentially the same
> receivers albeit with a different tube layout. Please note that in addition
> to containing a slide-rule dial with bandspread calibrated for the 80 - 10
> amateur bands, the HE-30 had a Q-multiplier; which was lacking in the HE-10.
>
> Ken Maltz, KC2YRJ
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lafayette mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lafayette
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lafayette at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/lafayette/attachments/20140609/e61714a9/attachment.html>