[KYHAM] New NO THEORY License class

[Anthony W. DePrato]

At 08:21 PM 1/21/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> > If cw is not the qualifier, then some added theory should be.
>
>I have no issue with this.  Making the tests harder as you go up, and thus
>giving you greater access into the amateur bands is fine with me.
>
>Theory, unlike CW, is a part of amateur radio regardless of what mode or
>protocol you use.
>
>-Tyler

SNIP
VERY TRUE. but let us get back to learning the theory and do away with 
giving out the question pools then. learn the theory as they did in 
the  40's 50's and early 60's . you had to know the theory to pass the 
tests. not the memorizing as goes on today.. keep the  code.. if you want 
an extra ticket then learn the code at 20 wpm. earn as you go. the more you 
learn about electronics the more freqs you get. ever wonder why the USA is 
so far behind in electronics  ? most of our top people are not born here 
but come from other countries.  when was the last time you got treated by a 
born in the USA Dr. ?
i am not  talking down about anyone just stop and think about it.. we have 
made it too ez and no one even wants to put out what it takes for any thing 
in this day and time.
73 Tony


>_______________________________________________
>Support Amateur Radio in Kentucky!
>http://www.kyham.net/