[KL7AA] Fwd: MRT Bulletin: Martin appointment could stall BPL
John E Lynn Jr
johnlynn at gci.net
Sat Mar 19 00:32:37 EST 2005
good news!
* Wavelengths*
* Martin appointment could stall BPL*
By Glenn Bischoff
March 18, 2005
President Bush's appointment of Kevin Martin to succeed Michael Powell
as FCC chairman should come as no surprise. Martin is well regarded
within the Republican Party, worked on the president's first-term
campaign and his wife once worked for Vice President Dick Cheney,
according to sources.
Martin proved to be an intelligent, thoughtful and capable commissioner
who wasn't afraid to buck Powell when he thought it right and necessary.
Martin outmaneuvered Powell a couple of years ago during an FCC
proceeding concerning wireline telephone rules and prevailed when the
commission drafted an order that reflected Martin's, not Powell's,
perspective.
Just because a federal appeals court later vindicated Powell and
overturned the order shouldn't diminish Martin's actions. It took a good
bit of, ahem, fortitude to stand up to Powell, who has his own
well-developed power base in Washington and within the GOP.
That Martin stood up to Powell when it would have been far easier -- and
much more politically expedient -- to toe the party line speaks well of
his character and his ability to lead the commission.
However, one thing that Martin is not is Powell. Consequently, Martin's
ascension to the FCC's helm ultimately could have a negative effect on
the nascent broadband-over-power lines technology.
Powell was an unabashed cheerleader for BPL, which he saw as the panacea
for bringing high-speed data services to underserved areas, particularly
rural areas, where infrastructure costs are so high that cable companies
and wireline telephone companies can't justify the deployments. His
enthusiasm for BPL largely drove public utilities -- ultra-conservative
organizations by nature -- to take the leap, according to Nancy Kaplan,
vice president of Adventis, a consultancy headquartered in Boston.
"Powell was remarkably supportive [of BPL]," Kaplan said. "Having that
support made all the difference in terms of the utilities being willing
to go after this. ... They got burned by telecom in the past, so feeling
that they really had somebody who was going to support them from a
regulatory standpoint and make it easy for them actually has made BPL
move more quickly than it might have otherwise."
Kaplan predicted that Martin will support BPL, but won't share Powell's
zeal. Without such a champion going forward, BPL could fall well short
of Powell's vision -- some would say dream -- for the still-developing
technology.
"BPL could end up being a small alternative that is used for a few
things," Kaplan said. "It has some value for the utilities themselves
for their internal operations. I think it will move in that direction
rather than becoming a large consumer option."
Such an outcome would thrill the nation's amateur radio operators, who
are gravely concerned that radiation leakage stemming from BPL will
cause harmful interference to their operations and are quite angry with
Powell for not giving those concerns greater heed. When the FCC approved
rules in November 2004 that cleared the way for widespread deployment of
the technology, which uses the nation's power grid to deliver broadband
services. Powell said those concerns weren't enough to justify putting
the brakes on BPL and that the commission's rules provided adequate
protection for the hams.
"The potential for the American economy is too great -- is too
potentially groundbreaking -- to sit idly by and allow any claim or any
possible speculative fear to keep us from trying to drive this
technology and drive America into the broadband future," Powell said at
the time.
I don't know enough about BPL to be able to comment on whether the
potential interference problems will simply go away should utilities
limit their use of the technology for applications such as remote
monitoring of meters. But I do know something about Martin, having
covered him and interviewed him on numerous occasions over the past four
years.
Though a Republican, Martin has demonstrated he is less interested in
doing what's good for big business -- and public utilities certainly
qualify -- than he is in doing what's in the public's best interest.
Martin did just that in the wireline telephone debate, when he sided
with competitive carriers against the incumbents, led by the gargantuan
former Bell companies Verizon, SBC and BellSouth. Consequently, both the
FCC and the utilities might be rethinking their BPL strategies at some
point during Martin's tenure.
E-mail me at gbischoff at primediabusiness.com
<mailto:gbischoff at primediabusiness.com>
Primedia Business Magazines & Media
9800 Metcalf Avenue
Overland Park, KS 66212
Copyright 2005, PRIMEDIA. All rights reserved. This article is protected
by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may
not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed, re-disseminated, transmitted,
displayed, published or broadcast, directly or indirectly, in any medium
without the prior written permission of Primedia Business Magazines &
Media Inc.
More information about the KL7AA
mailing list