[Kenwood] wider transmit SSB audio TS 480

[Paul Pagel]

Meir's lecturing? 

Rob, Meir is giving well-founded information. You're the one who's lecturing. 
 
73,
 
Paul / N1FB


--- On Tue, 5/5/09, Rob <k5uj at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

From: Rob <k5uj at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [Kenwood] wider transmit SSB audio TS 480
To: wf2u at ws19ops.com
Cc: kenwood at mailman.qth.net
Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 7:46 AM

Meir,

The guy asked if there is a way to open up his 480.  If there isn't,  
why not tell him that, or do you not know.  He didn't ask for a  
lecture on tx bandwidth; he asked how to open up his rig.

Why not peddle your bandwidth lecture to all these manufacturers  
making rigs that tx out of the box 5 KHz or more?    The truth is that  
wide response sounds good.  Excuse me while I enjoy my hobby with  
something other than space shuttle quality audio, which if I wanted,  
would make me an Icom owner.

Joe, if there's no way to open up the 480 on tx you may have to get  
another rig.   A used TS870 would be a good choice provided it is in  
decent shape.   Search the ssbaudio yahoo group archive or the mods.dk  
website to see if there is anything there.

73

rob / k5uj




On May 4, 2009, at 3:45 PM, wf2u at ws19ops.com wrote:

>
> Since human voice carries most of its intelligence (hmmm...) between
> 300 and 3000 Hz, it doesn't make much sense to transmit wider than 2.7
> kHz for maximum intelligibility and not exceed transmission bandwidth
> standards on HF. Widening to 3 KHz will not really add to anything,
> your actual voice will be carried with less average power as some of
> the power will be wasted transmitting noise and parts of the voice
> which are not necessary and (may not be even heard) for the
> intelligence carried over the transmission media.
> In order to tailor the available bandwidth to your individual voice
> characteristics, you can employ an equalizer which will enhance the
> spectrum of your voice which may not be strong, reducing
> intelligibility, but within the restraints of 2.7 KHz (or rather 2.4
> KHz which doesn't take anything away from the intelligibility. Smart
> tailoring of the audio response will make your voice sound fuller and
> more penetrating, all pluses for radio communications.
>
> MHO and experience (also profession as EE...) but YMMV.
>
> 73, Meir WF2U
> Landrum, SC
>
>
> Quoting Joe <n3ain at hotmail.com>:
>
>> Hi. Is there any way to get more than a 2.4 wide band width from the
>> Kenwood 480. Kenwood rigs are known for there good audio and most
>> of  them go out to 3K on transmit. The narrow transmit band width
>> is  the only thing I don't like about this rig. If this could be
>> done,  it would make this the perfect rig in my opinion. The receive
>> audio  is good.
>> Thanks and 73. n3ain.
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Kenwood mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Kenwood mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html