[Kenwood] TS850SAT and optional filters

[Steef PA2A]

Jorge,

I have them both installed in my TS850SAT. Theoretically there is not much 
difference
between them, see http://www.qth.com/inrad/graphs/103.gif and 
http://www.qth.com/inrad/graphs/22.gif

The -6dB / -60dB  bandwidths are 460 Hz / 985 Hz and 367.5 Hz / 845 Hz for 
the filters. Not much
difference but in CW it is good to have also the 250Hz #22 as well as the 
#103 and both are wide
enough for RTTY operation.
Best 73 's

Steef PA2A

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge at adinet.com.uy>
To: <Kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 6:43 PM
Subject: [Kenwood] TS850SAT and optional filters


> Hello,
>
> Will apreciate any feedback on experience using TS850SAT and CW optional
> filters.
>
> I used for years a TS450SAT with YG-455C-1 500 hz 455.0 KhZ filter.
>
> Now I have a TS850SAT without filters. I install the YG-455C-1 and I like
> very much the slope tuning, a very nice feature in the 850
>
> I want to improve the RX, so I am going to aditional CW 8830 kHz filters.
>
> My idea is the INRAD filters, but don´t know if will be better a 250 hz
> (#22) or the 400 hz (#103) model.
>
> If anyone in the list use this INRAD filters will apreciate very much your
> comments.
>
> Happy New Year 2008!!
>
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM
>
_____________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>
>