[Kenwood] SM-220 VS SM-230 etc etc - duh!
WD8ARZ
wd8arz at ix.netcom.com
Sun Mar 13 20:24:27 EST 2005
Yes, you all are so correct. Remind me not to do emails with a headache ...
hi hi
Two other scopes I have here are tube, and I incorrectly remembered a
collection of tube spares I had held onto for the 'scope', but of course not
for the 220 .... sorry for the big duh moment!
Anyway, the comment about the drifting is (hopefully) remembered correctly
as being worse on the 230.
73 from Bill - WD8ARZ (heading to get the benadryl)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fern Rivard" <crc at cyberlink.bc.ca>
To: "WD8ARZ" <wd8arz at ix.netcom.com>; <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Kenwood] SM-220 VS SM-230 etc etc
>I have a couple of the Kenwood SM-220 monitor scopes and I must remind you
>that this particular unit is NOT tube version but is also solid state just
>like the SM-230 version!
> Fern
More information about the Kenwood
mailing list