[Kenwood] "New" TS-940S

[Conrad & Kathi Nasatka]

Hi All:
Just had to jump in.  I have owned a Kenwood TS 950-SDX for about a year. I 
purchased it as a package deal from a guy with the Station Monitor SM-230. 
The DX I get on 100 watts and breaking through pile ups is unreal.  I have 
been a ham for over 25 years.  My new 830 I thought was the best, in its 
time.  However, this unit with a beam that I just put up a year ago, a Force 
12, Model XR-5, has given me outstanding signal reports no matter where I am 
QSO ing.  I guess we could go on for days, just had to put my 2 cents in.  I 
love my Kenwood's and especially my 950 SDX.
Regards
73 to all
Conrad
WB3DQD
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Goran Arezina, T98G" <t98g at teol.net>
To: <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 7:43 AM
Subject: [Kenwood] "New" TS-940S


>
> Philip,KA4KOE wrote:
>
> "...The 950SDX may be the best ever of
> Kenwood's amateur rigs, but it doesn't look as pretty as a 940...."
>
> Hello Philip,
>
> Your 940 is a great one, but comment about 950SDX is too wrong.
> Have you  ever had  a  one of 950 SDX?
> Or, your way of thinking  what is a nice / what is ugly, is very  strange 
> to me!?
> Somebody likes guys!!! (Just joking  -  do not  mind me!)
>
> Don't be mad on me,  but I  had to comment.
> 100s of hours with  930 and 940, and I  like them, but  I'm owner of SDX , 
> and  just  trust me it  is like a FERRARI ,  or  just  like  a very GOOD 
> looking  girl. .
>
> Kind regards  &  73,
>
> Goran , T98G (4N4AE)
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>