[Kenwood] Question of Credibility

Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:51:50 -0500

> > I'm beginning to wonder about the credibility of the members of this
> > list.

Agreed, the post didn't have anything to do with Kenwood, but at least
touched on Amateur Radio and said in the spirit of Ham Radio. What has that
got to do with credibility?

Mine at least endorsed a fellow ham's thoughts on self policing. Your
cynical remarks puts YOUR credibility in doubt ole man. Don't for a moment
think I am going to respond to any more from you in the same tone!

Ron, 6Y5/4S7RO

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron & Madhavi" <[email protected]>
To: "James Duffer" <[email protected]>; "John Parker"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Kenwood] Question of Credibility

> Speak of bandwidth!  Not only posted twice but reviving a horse that died
> y'day!
>
> Ron
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Parker" <[email protected]>
> To: "Ron & Madhavi" <[email protected]>; "James Duffer"
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 3:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] Question of Credibility
>
>
> > I'm beginning to wonder about the credibility of the members of this
> > list.  Do we have to keep on this topic?
> >
> > I knew a guy, who knew a guy, who knew a guy who had the same problem.
> Get
> > over it and move on.
> >
> > Otherwise, unsubscribe from the list and take your stories to the back
> channel.
> >
> > Hope the horse dies soon!!
> >
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> > At 03:52 PM 7/25/03 -0500, Ron & Madhavi wrote:
> > >Very correct Jim,rhe day we stop doing so, we jeopardize our very
> survival!
> > >We have an obligation to self police and ALWAYS assist the authorities
> track
> > >down law breakers and pirates.
> > >
> > >73,
> > >Ron
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "James Duffer" <[email protected]>
> > >To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
> > >Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:37 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [Kenwood] Question of Credibility
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > It was written:
> > > >
> > > > >We are not the fcc or the police.
> > > >
> > > > Why has the amateur radio service historically touted to be "self
> > >policeing"
> > > > if there are no amateur "police"
> > > >
> > > > The FCC relies heavily on the self policeing aspect of this service.
> > > >
> > > > 73, Jim, wd4air
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> > > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> > > >
> > > > - - -
> > > >
> > > > Your moderator for this list is:
> > > > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Kenwood mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> > >
> > >- - -
> > >
> > >Your moderator for this list is:
> > >Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Kenwood mailing list
> > >[email protected]
> > >http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> >
> > - - -
> >
> > Your moderator for this list is:
> > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kenwood mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>