[Kenwood] Re: Kenwood digest, Vol 1 #134 - 12 msgs
Rhonda Field
[email protected]
Fri, 10 May 2002 09:50:54 +1200
Please delete this email address from your mailing list. The recipient
Eddie Field died on Monday 8 May.
Thank You
R Field
[email protected] wrote:
>
> Send Kenwood mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Kenwood digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Re: [kw-radio] kenwood ts530sp (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
> 2. Re: MC 90 (sergio lopes)
> 3. FS R-1000 (Leisman)
> 4. FS: Mint TS-870S (Ron Pfeiffer)
> 5. What Hand Mic. please? (Leslie Zwiebel)
> 6. Re: What Hand Mic. please? (Ron & Madhavi)
> 7. Re: What Hand Mic. please? (Leslie Zwiebel)
> 8. Fw: Rejected: Re: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please? (Ron & Madhavi)
> 9. MC 35 same as MC 35S? (Leslie Zwiebel)
> 10. Sorry Guys! (Ron & Madhavi)
> 11. Re: MC 35 same as MC 35S? (Clif)
> 12. MC 35 Microphone (Donnie Garrett)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 10:07:41 -0500
> From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer" <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Organization: Gerald N. Johnson
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: m0dbo <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] Re: [kw-radio] kenwood ts530sp
>
> Dropping screen voltage drops the plate current in direct proportion, so
> the plate dissipation also drops in the same proportion. The output
> network will be mismatched, and that will loose efficiency. It won't be
> possible to load and tune for maximum output. Just set the loading
> normal for the band and peak the output with the plate tuning.
>
> For that matter, normal idling conditions is at about maximum rated
> plate dissipation, but the dissipation stays the same for very small
> signals, so getting QRP by turning down the drive is often effective,
> but harder to control. Lowering the screen voltage will reduce the
> idling plate dissipation and limit the peak power output so that keeping
> to QRP power levels is made much easier.
>
> 73, Jerry, K0CQ
> --
> Entire content copyright Dr. Gerald N. Johnson. Reproduction by
> permission only.
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: "sergio lopes" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 01:01:15 +0200
> Subject: [Kenwood] Re: MC 90
>
> hello.friends.=20
> I have a Kenwood MC90 microphoneto sell.
> As new,three months old.Used once
> I don`t smoke ($180 or 200? )
> I also have a MFJ-207 HF SWR analyser to sell.
> New never used ($50 or 60? ).
> All the accessories have the original boxes and
> manuals with instructions.
> sergio lopes CT1EWX
> Telephone.....289-706191
> e-mail:[email protected]
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
> Please post in Plain-Text only.---
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 21:51:24 -0400
> From: Leisman <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: [Kenwood] FS R-1000
>
> For Sale: Kenwood R-1000 receiver. No filters, no manual and some
> nominal scratches on top of the unit. Otherwise its a great receiver.
> Asking $200 or best offer plus shipping from 48879. E-mail me direct if
> interested. Dave-W8QW
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: "Ron Pfeiffer" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 08:42:54 -0400
> Subject: [Kenwood] FS: Mint TS-870S
>
> Mint TS-870 with hand mic, manual, power cord, and original box.
> Asking $1200.00 plus shipping from zip 01604.
>
> The serial number is 00800075 and it has the latest EPROMS and Hardware
> enhancement.
>
> Thanks- Ron N1ZSW
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 06:29:37 -0700
> From: Leslie Zwiebel <[email protected]>
> To: Kenwood List <[email protected]>
> Organization: SMCPA Mail List
> Subject: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?
>
> was originally called out or supplied for the TS 830?
> Thanks,
> Les
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> From: "Ron & Madhavi" <[email protected]>
> To: "Leslie Zwiebel" <[email protected]>,
> "Kenwood List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 08:33:57 -0500
>
> It was the noise cancelling hand mic MC35
>
> 73,
> Ron, 6Y5/4S7RO
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Leslie Zwiebel <[email protected]>
> To: Kenwood List <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:29 AM
> Subject: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?
>
> > was originally called out or supplied for the TS 830?
> > Thanks,
> > Les
> > - - -
> >
> > Your moderator for this list is:
> > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kenwood mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 06:39:34 -0700
> From: Leslie Zwiebel <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?
> To: Ron & Madhavi <[email protected]>,
> Kenwood List <[email protected]>
> Organization: SMCPA Mail List
>
> Thanks, Ron.
> (((((73)))))
> Les
>
> Ron & Madhavi wrote:
> >
> > It was the noise cancelling hand mic MC35
> >
> > 73,
> > Ron, 6Y5/4S7RO
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Leslie Zwiebel <[email protected]>
> > To: Kenwood List <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:29 AM
> > Subject: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?
> >
> > > was originally called out or supplied for the TS 830?
> > > Thanks,
> > > Les
> > > - - -
> > >
> > > Your moderator for this list is:
> > > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Kenwood mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> From: "Ron & Madhavi" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Fw: Rejected: Re: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 08:57:13 -0500
>
> Hi Leslie,
>
> (With apologies to the group, since this is the ONLY way I can reach you)!
> You asked a question on the reflector and although I normally answer
> specific questions direct, this time I CCed to Kenwood as well. You
> obviously have good reasons to do this and I understand that. However, let
> me say (without malice) that it is usually good practice not to "throw"
> people out when they show the courtesy to answer a question posted over a
> reflector. When you post a question over a reflector like this, you make the
> choice to receive direct replies as well. Kenwood questions are usually of
> interest to all, but every now and then a questions pop up - to which a
> direct reply seems more appropriate.
>
> You are obviously doing this to keep spam off your in-box. However, let me
> ssure you that this wil not be the first and the last time a person answers
> you direct, off the reflector and feels a bit let down! If you must, perhaps
> you can rephrase your message. After answering in good faith, to be "thrown
> out" doesn't sound polite at all!!! Howeevr, I assure you that I understand
> this wasn't anything personal against me!!!!
> 73,
> Ron, 6Y5/4S7RO
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:30 AM
> Subject: Rejected: Re: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?
>
> > Your e-mail to '[email protected]' has been rejected.
> >
> > This is an automated reply to your e-mail from '[email protected]',
> > with subject 'Re: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?'. Your mail was
> automatically thrown away since
> > you are not in the list of people who are allowed to send e-mail to
> > '[email protected]'. If you wish to send e-mail to '[email protected]'
> you must
> > first visit:
> >
> >
> http://q3.quik.com/cgi-bin/spamweb.pl?user=sparks&[email protected]
> >
> > and enter your e-mail address on that web-page.
> >
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 06:59:15 -0700
> From: Leslie Zwiebel <[email protected]>
> To: Kenwood List <[email protected]>
> Organization: SMCPA Mail List
> Subject: [Kenwood] MC 35 same as MC 35S?
>
> I just received a kind reply that the MC 35 was the original hand mic
> for the TS 830?
> Is that the same as the MC 35S?
> Trying to find the right mic as a gift for my friend and Elmer.
> Thanks again.
> (((((73)))))
> Les
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> From: "Ron & Madhavi" <[email protected]>
> To: "Ron & Madhavi" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 09:05:15 -0500
> Subject: [Kenwood] Sorry Guys!
>
> Ooops....looks like I goofed. I have been thrown out of Kenwood as well! I
> guess its because of my HTML message. Apologies to Leslie and the others for
> my lecture -- obviously out of ignorance! Oh am down on my knees no smoke
> please!!!!
>
> 73 to all,
> Ron
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ron & Madhavi <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:57 AM
> Subject: Fw: Rejected: Re: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?
>
> >
> > Hi Leslie,
> >
> > (With apologies to the group, since this is the ONLY way I can reach you)!
> > You asked a question on the reflector and although I normally answer
> > specific questions direct, this time I CCed to Kenwood as well. You
> > obviously have good reasons to do this and I understand that. However, let
> > me say (without malice) that it is usually good practice not to "throw"
> > people out when they show the courtesy to answer a question posted over a
> > reflector. When you post a question over a reflector like this, you make
> the
> > choice to receive direct replies as well. Kenwood questions are usually of
> > interest to all, but every now and then a questions pop up - to which a
> > direct reply seems more appropriate.
> >
> > You are obviously doing this to keep spam off your in-box. However, let me
> > ssure you that this wil not be the first and the last time a person
> answers
> > you direct, off the reflector and feels a bit let down! If you must,
> perhaps
> > you can rephrase your message. After answering in good faith, to be
> "thrown
> > out" doesn't sound polite at all!!! Howeevr, I assure you that I
> understand
> > this wasn't anything personal against me!!!!
> > 73,
> > Ron, 6Y5/4S7RO
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:30 AM
> > Subject: Rejected: Re: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?
> >
> >
> > > Your e-mail to '[email protected]' has been rejected.
> > >
> > > This is an automated reply to your e-mail from '[email protected]',
> > > with subject 'Re: [Kenwood] What Hand Mic. please?'. Your mail was
> > automatically thrown away since
> > > you are not in the list of people who are allowed to send e-mail to
> > > '[email protected]'. If you wish to send e-mail to '[email protected]'
> > you must
> > > first visit:
> > >
> > >
> > http://q3.quik.com/cgi-bin/spamweb.pl?user=sparks&[email protected]
> > >
> > > and enter your e-mail address on that web-page.
> > >
> >
> > - - -
> >
> > Your moderator for this list is:
> > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kenwood mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> Reply-To: "Clif" <[email protected]>
> From: "Clif" <[email protected]>
> To: "Leslie Zwiebel" <[email protected]>,
> "Kenwood List" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Kenwood] MC 35 same as MC 35S?
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 09:24:12 -0500
> Organization: AVVid
>
> The TS830S did not come with a microphone as standard equipment. Listed in
> the owners manual are three appropiate microphones for use with the 830.
> They are MC-50 Desk Microphone, MC-35S Noise Cancelling Hand Microphone (50k
> Ohm), MC-30S Noise Cancelling Hand Microphone (500 ohm).
>
> Clif Holland, KA5IPF
> AVVid
> Authorized Kenwood and Icom Amateur Service
> www.avvid.com
> 1-800-214-5779
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Leslie Zwiebel" <[email protected]>
> To: "Kenwood List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:59 AM
> Subject: [Kenwood] MC 35 same as MC 35S?
>
> > I just received a kind reply that the MC 35 was the original hand mic
> > for the TS 830?
> > Is that the same as the MC 35S?
> > Trying to find the right mic as a gift for my friend and Elmer.
> > Thanks again.
> > (((((73)))))
> > Les
> > - - -
> >
> > Your moderator for this list is:
> > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kenwood mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> >
> >
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 12
> From: "Donnie Garrett" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 10:03:00 -0400
> Subject: [Kenwood] MC 35 Microphone
>
> Wondering if the MC 35 or MC 35S is a high impedance mic. The TS-520s
> manual says the mic should be a hi-impedance. Wondering about the MC-50 and
> MC-60 as well.
>
> 73's Don
>
> All email is virus-checked by Norton Anti-Virus 2002
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>
> End of Kenwood Digest