[Kenwood] "Reply To:" to where? (Was: new reflector software glitch?)

Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:12:03 -0500

Not when you are buying/selling/trading/etc.....Please set the reply to to
the sender only; if its of interest to all then cc the reflector. Look in
the archives, the amount of mail has gone through the roof since the new
software was brought on line.

----- Original Message -----
From: "ON5ZK" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Kenwood] "Reply To:" to where? (Was: new reflector software
glitch?)

> You got my vote too, Fred.
>
> If the default reply doesn't go to the list then I say the list serves not
> much purpose, as I'm sure that many replies are of interest to the whole
> group, not just that one person.
>
> 73,
>
> Gert
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fred Stevens K2FRD" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:27 PM
> Subject: [Kenwood] "Reply To:" to where? (Was: new reflector software
> glitch?)
>
>
> > My vote is on the other side: I prefer the default "Reply To:" to go
> > to the List. I belong to about 25 eLists and most of my responses
> > (like this) are intended to go to everyone. Only a small percentage
> > are intended only for the sender, e.g. response to a solicitation to
> > sell an item or request for personal information about someone (e.g.
> > email address). Most topics are of general interest and it defeats
> > the purpose of an eList if a response to a general subject are sent
> > only to the original sender.
> >
> > BTW, of these 25-odd eLists, only a couple are set for the default
> > "Reply To:" to be sent to the individual sender rather than the List.
> >
> > Of course, there are exceptions to all generalizations, e.g. flames
> > should not be posted to the List, even though many (most of whom are
> > not involved) would enjoy them for their entertainment value.
> >
> > 73, Fred
> > K2FRD
> >
> > >I agree with Fern!
> > >
> > >Steve W4IMF
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Fern Rivard" <[email protected]>
> > >To: <[email protected]>
> > >Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 12:31 AM
> > >Subject: Re: [Kenwood] new reflector software glitch?
> > >
> > >
> > >>  It sure would be nice and I think appreciated by the majority if the
> > >default
> > >>  reply was to the individual in question rather than the whole group.
> What
> > >do
> > >>  the rest of you folks think?   Thanks from Fern
> >
> > --
> > 73, Fred Stevens K2FRD
> > Chenango Co. (NY) Assistant Emergency Coordinator
> > Foothills District, Otschodela Council BSA Committees
> > Otschodela Council Amateur Radio Group
> http://www.ascent.net/thefred/ocarg.htm
> > K2FRD Personal Adventure page:  http://www.ascent.net/thefred/K2FRD.htm
> > Subscribe to the OCARG EAGLE monthly newsletter (no cost, no spam):
> > Send email to:  mailto:[email protected]
> >
> > - - -
> >
> > Your moderator for this list is:
> > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kenwood mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> >
> >
>
>
> - - -
>
> Your moderator for this list is:
> Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood