[KCDXC] FW: FW: answer Duncan: DAYTON

[rick barnett]

You say you are done with name calling then start over again. You are all
over the place with your BS.
I have not signed up any new members just for voting. That's stupid on your
part, but that has been the normal for you. There are only two of us here in
Texas and I will always be a member of the KCDXC, that is unless 26% of the
members still want you around, then I will be gone. Till be next election.
$15

-----Original Message-----
From: kcdxc-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:kcdxc-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of ku1cw at yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:40 PM
To: 'kcdxc'
Cc: 'Even Lighter Side of KCDXC'
Subject: Re: [KCDXC] FW: FW: answer Duncan: DAYTON


Rick,
 I think that I'm done with name calling and non-constructive criticism
coming from you... no need to reply anymore for something like that.  Couple
of people from TX would never accept any constructive changes-why waste
time?

....and why TX guys participate more than anyone else in this  campaign and
not so much in other productive club reflector activities?

 TX is running campaign of signing new members just for this task, asking
people to vote certain way and one of them even have sent me draft om my
resignation letter!!! ....but still looking for the constitution of the 80's
though.

 Let's listen to some balanced voices as well. Please stop running hate
messages.
Alex


--- On Thu, 7/9/09, rick barnett <rick at crcwireless.net> wrote:

> From: rick barnett <rick at crcwireless.net>
> Subject: FW: [KCDXC] FW: answer Duncan: DAYTON
> To: "'kcdxc'" <kcdxc at mailman.qth.net>
> Cc: "'Even Lighter Side of KCDXC'" <kcdxcforfun at byrg.net>
> Date: Thursday, July 9, 2009, 1:25 PM
> Just want to make sure everyone sees
> what crap he is putting out...STILL
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex, KU1CW [mailto:ku1cw at yahoo.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:11 PM
> To: 'Duncan MacLachlan'; 'kcdxc'; rick barnett
> Cc: 'Even Lighter Side of KCDXC'
> Subject: Re: [KCDXC] FW: answer Duncan: DAYTON
> 
> 
> 
> -about 10 out of 65 members were present at the meetings
> -meetings had no agenda broadcasted to general membership
> -no Dayton committee was created to work on
> preparation  
> -proposals were not voted at the meetings
> -proposals were not broadcasted to general membership via
> e-mail
> -Proposals were not voted by general membership, but
> accepted by one or few
> -secretary position did not exist (why?) for few years, so
> no records
> -you was out to TX for the about 2-3(?)+ years and missed
> last 24 (36)+
> meetings at least.  
> -fact that someone is not at the meeting should not be the
> reason not to
> communicate decisions to general membership in the 21th
> century and have a
> vote, if necessary.
> -etc......
> 
> Alex's behavior 
> > > on the PIle Up  question as a guide,  the
> > > Convention Committee can
> > > just go ahead and schedule the event for next
> year
> > and
> > > start booking rooms,
> > > speakers and send out news releases to the
> ARRL!!!
> 
> 
> 
>



      
______________________________________________________________
KCDXC mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kcdxc
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:KCDXC at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html