[K3CAL] Fwd: “It’s not real Ham Radio!” by Chris G7DDN

[k3uga at comcast.net]

 <http://network-radios.com/index.php/product/inrico-tm-8-3g-wifi-irn-mobile-network-radio-android-unlocked/>

 in the picture - The new Inrico TM-8
<http://network-radios.com/index.php/product/inrico-tm-8-3g-wifi-irn-mobile-network-radio-android-unlocked/>

 *A Pioneering Background*

 I was musing recently on the wonderful history of Amateur Radio, from the
early pioneers with spark transmitters and the race to get the first
signals across the Atlantic, up to the Microwave enthusiasts who developed
the way forward for space communications and satellite technology (and,
whisper this, mobile phone technology!)

 The history of Ham Radio and RF technology is inextricably linked - there
was even a time here in the UK where it was believed, anecdotally, that a
Ham Radio callsign would help you to get a job with the BBC!

 However change came very quickly, relatively speaking, in the early
history of radio. From Marconi's experiments to the first Public Broadcast
Stations was only 25 or so years. TV was only another 15 years or so behind
that, and so on…

 *Resistance (or not feeling at “Ohm”)*

 Yet the history of Ham Radio is also one of /resistance/ to change - not
from the pioneers, they were often instigators of it, but from the
“everyday” Hams.

 Let me see if I can give you some examples, with my tongue planted very
firmly in my cheek…

 *“That's not Real Ham Radio!”*

 The early Hams used CW pretty much exclusively. So when AM arrived as one
of the first of the voice modes, there was a bit of an uproar…/“It's
not real Ham Radio! Real Ham Radio involves using a Morse Key! What in
world is the hobby coming to, using //voice// to communicate over the
airwaves? It's sacrilege!”/

 But life went on, AM found acceptance and all was well in Hamland once
again.

 Then transistor technology arrived in the late 1940s and early 1950s,
provoking quite a response. /“Hang on! That's not real Ham Radio. Real
Ham Radios glow in the dark - we can't be having this miniature technology
- they'll never last as long as valves or be as reliable”/

 But life went on, solid state devices found acceptance and all was well in
Hamland once again.

 Then SSB arrived and there was /more/ discontent… /“That's not real
Ham Radio. Real Ham Radios don't sound like Donald Duck! It's a fad, it
will soon fall away once people get fed up of hearing those silly
voices”/

 But life went on, SSB found acceptance and all was well in Hamland once
again.

 Then FM and repeaters arrived and there was polarisation within the hobby
(and it wasn't horizontal or vertical either!) /“That's not real Ham
Radio. Real Ham Radio doesn't need to use that thing on top of the hill to
help your signal get somewhere! Real Ham Radio is point to point!”/

 But life went on, FM & repeaters found acceptance and all was well in
Hamland once again.

 Then Packet Radio arrived and there was /real/ trouble… /“That's not
real Ham Radio. Real Ham Radio doesn't need one of those new-fangled
computer thingies in order to work. Get your key or your mic out and start
working other Hams properly!”/

 But life went on, Packet Radio found acceptance and all was well in
Hamland once again.

 Then Digimodes arrived and there was yet more strife… /“That's not
real Ham Radio. Real Ham Radio doesn't involve //typing// messages to other
Hams - and those perishing computers again! What on Earth are they doing in
the hobby?”/

 But life went on, Digimodes found acceptance and all was well in Hamland
once again.

 Then Digital Voice modes arrived and there were some /very/ serious
disagreements… /“That's not real Ham Radio. Real Ham Radios don't sound
like R2D2! Real radios don't use the Internet to help them get round the
world, they ABSOLUTELY HAVE to use atmospheric propagation. What is
happening to this hobby???”/

 But life went on, D-STAR and other Digital Voice modes found acceptance
and all was well in Hamland once again.

 Then we arrive at today and Network Radios come onto the scene and all
hell breaks loose! “/That's not real Ham Radio. This is //playing// at
Ham Radio - there's no Amateur RF so it is simply not Ham Radio. What is
more, I worked hard for my license, everyone else should have to too! How
dare people enjoy communications in an incorrect manner!” /

 So will life go on and will all ever be well in Hamland again?

 *The 21st Century Challenge*

 This is why the advent of Network Radios represents such a challenge to us
as Hams - it is causing us to completely rethink what it means to be a
Radio Amateur in 2018 and beyond.

 And we will have to start facing up to questions similar to these…

 What exactly defines a Radio Amateur?
 What do we mean by “Amateur RF”?
 Is it RF generated by someone who is an Amateur?
 Or is it RF generated on a particular band allocated to us by the
government?
 If so, does it absolutely HAVE to be that?
 Can it be nothing else?
 Does any of this really matter?

 *What about our bands?*

 As Hams we are very “attached” to our bands. Whether it be 160m or 2m,
we almost have a psychological sense of “ownership” of them.

 We have “favourite” bands, we have bands we /never/ frequent.

 We even have “our” spot frequencies and some Hams will get somewhat
“assertive” if a fellow amateur who is not in their “group” /dares/
to use “their” frequency!

 And yet in the 21st Century, I believe that the whole concept of bands &
frequencies is becoming ever more fluid. Why would this be?

 *An example from Broadcast Radio*

 Not that long ago, we could tune into broadcast stations on Long Wave
(LF), Medium Wave (MF), Short Wave (HF) and FM (VHF Band II). Stations
frequently referred to themselves by frequency: “247 metres Radio 1” or
“1152 AM” for example. It was seen part of the station's identity -
many had the frequency in their station names!

 But today, we increasingly hear less of this. When you listen to broadcast
stations these days, they seem to be eschewing giving out frequencies,
instead they just announce that they are on “FM, DAB and Digital” or
something similar to that.

 Why? Because radio is something you probably increasingly consume in one
of two ways - either digitally (via DAB or Satellite or similar means) or
by streaming via the Internet. Frequencies and by extension, bands, are not
as relevant as they once were.

 *Moving Out!*

 The large broadcasters are also increasingly moving away from
“traditional” radio.

 On Short Wave - only a few countries & various religious groups seem to
operate there now. The big guys are moving out of Long and Medium Wave too.
If commercial broadcasters are moving away, we need to ask why.

 *Do Bands matter?*

 I have a suspicion that this is, in part at least, because bands and
frequencies don't matter so much these days. Domestic radio appliances are
more about push buttons and screens that get you to your station instantly,
rather than tuning dials with frequencies. It's the end product that is
important, not necessarily the manner in which it gets to you.

 Who tunes a modern broadcast radio in these days with a manual tuning
dial? Anyone? It was the main knob on all radios not that many years ago! I
can even remember tuning old VHF TV in with a dial in my early days on this
planet - that /really/ seems odd now!

 Going one step further, many broadcast stations are not even using direct
RF at all these days! We still refer to them as “radio stations” (or
occasionally “Internet radio stations”)

 Is there any reason to think Ham Radio as a hobby will not invariably move
in a similar kind of direction? One of our strengths historically as Hams
has been that we are good at embracing new technologies and adapting them
for our own uses.

 The point I am leading up to is this - I suspect “bands” and
“frequencies” are not really as big an issue in the digital age as we
might /like/ them to be.

 In essence, bands only exist because of propagation.

 *Propagation again*

 160, 40m, 20m,10m, 2m etc. are all, in reality, “line-of-sight” bands.
To over-simply the subject, it is the ionospheric or tropospheric layers
that enhance this line-of-sight propagation and turn it into something
else.

 Each band has differing propagation qualities as a result, giving each
band its “character” and for some, the study of propagation in itself
is a fascinating part of the hobby.

 *Man-made propagation is just different*

 When we think of (and use) the /Internet/ as a man-made propagating medium
(which is what it is - it propagates signals around the world) then the
concept of bands becomes redundant.

 The Internet is like one, almost infinitely wide, worldwide “band”,
constantly open S9+40 to all countries 24/7 with few vagaries - and not
just for voice, but for vision and other digital modes as well.

 Put like that, who wouldn't want to use it? Would it actually matter what
“band” you were (or were not) on, if there even were one?

 So the concept of “bands”, by which so many of us define our
activities, may be crumbling in front of us in this digital age and we may
not even realise it yet! That is not to say our bands don't still exist, by
the way - clearly they do. It is just that, to many people these days,
bands are a foreign concept.

 *And then what?*

 As the hobby starts to come to terms with some of the implications of
this, other issues then start to arise, such as…

 Do we need an exam any more to get a licence?
 Do we even need a licence?
 What form or forms should it take, if so?
 Might we see an influx of new people coming into the hobby because the
entry to it is more straightforward?
 How would we cope with that?
 Do we even /want/ new people coming in, especially if their views differ
from ours?
 What will the hobby even look like in 20 years time?
 What happens to our “traditional” bands?

 I expect to see a lot of discussion in the future about this - it's
actually quite exciting!

 *Out of the Comfort Zone…*

 However it will make many of us feel extremely uncomfortable - the ground
is shifting beneath our feet and the traditional raison d'être of Ham
Radio is waiting to be challenged to change and adapt…

 I don't see this as a bad thing - intelligent honest debate is to be
welcomed. The most important thing is to keep our minds and our thinking
wide open. We shouldn't reject something just because it is new or because
it challenges our preconceived ideas of where radio is going in general.

 Equally, we shouldn't throw the baby out with the bathwater and reject
traditional Ham Radio as it has been for years. The Ionosphere and the
Internet are complementary, not in competition.

 *My own opinion?*

 If you have read this far and you really want my personal thoughts…

 Why can we not have the best of both worlds? Surely we can.

 Network radios (at this stage in their development at least) are not
contest radios for example, and the Internet is not yet a contest-friendly
mode of propagation. (That might change of course!) so contesting is still
best on the traditional Ham bands. I'll see you on 80 metres - 59 001 OM…

 However, regular reliable high-quality contacts around the world are but
one thing Network Radios excel at, so why not just use that when you want
to (or when the HF bands are full of noise or are otherwise dead)? I do! I
don't see the expansion of choice in the hobby as a bad thing.

 *Enjoyment is the key*

 Does the fact that I am transmitting on cellular frequencies at 800MHz,
900MHz, 1800MHz, 2100MHz or on Wi-Fi on 2.4GHz or 5GHz matter? Is there
something intrinsically evil about that? Is there more virtue in using 21
MHz or 432MHz, for example? They are just “frequencies” after all.

 I prefer to see myself following the motto of my local radio club,
“Having fun with RF”. Whether I choose to use a Network Radio or a
Yaecomwood super-duper base station is not as relevant to me. Enjoyment of
the hobby is everything, otherwise why have a hobby?

 Whichever way this debate goes and whichever direction this great hobby
takes, my line would be to keep /all/ the richness of /every/ aspect of the
hobby.

 In other words, to go back to the title of this piece and change but one
word, /“It's //ALL// ‘real' Ham Radio”/

 © March 2018 - Chris Rolinson G7DDN <http://g7ddn.com/>




     <div class="footer" style="text-align:left; font-size: 75%;">
      <p>This message has been forwarded to you by k3uga at comcast.net.</p>
      <p>You have not been automatically subscribed to this newsletter.</p>
      <p>If you think this newsletter may interest you, you can <a
href="http://megahertz.shop/lists/?p=subscribe">Subscribe</a> and you will
receive our next newsletter directly to your inbox.</p>
      <p>You can also <a
href="http://megahertz.shop/lists/?p=donotsend&email=k3cal@mailman.qth.net">opt
out completely</a> from receiving any further email from our newsletter
application, phpList.</p>
    </div>
  


-- powered by phpList, www.phplist.com --


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/k3cal/attachments/20180309/7c425951/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: powerphplist.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3824 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/k3cal/attachments/20180309/7c425951/attachment-0001.png>