[K3CAL] Open letter to the board

[Eric Christensen]

On 03/04/2016 05:35 PM, David Olenjack wrote:
> Eric,
> 
> I found the issue.  Apparently (months ago) google decided you
> personally were spam. Don't know why but I fixed it.  I see all your
> emails now.

Yeah, Google is probably correct.  :)

> Yes you are right about the source of confusion:
> 
> *Perhaps this is part of the misunderstanding.  The digipeater part of
> the Prince Frederick Project has always been a part of the project and
> was approved along with the voice repeater.  I believe Jim's concern
> was a focus on the digipeater and not on linking the repeaters.
> 
> My response (although perhaps it wasn't clear?) was that I planned on
> working on both simultaneously and was not favoring either part of the
> project ahead of the other.
> 
> *
> This is the issue that I believe Dave Weaver is raising.  You can not
> just shelve the work on installing the digipeater in favor of working on
> that along with other things that have not been approved yet.

The digipeater was, is, and always has been part of the Prince Frederick
Project.  I'm not prioritizing or otherwise talking about doing work
that was not already approved.

--Eric