[K3CAL] interesting intermod read

[Wayne Rogers]

FWIW - the FCC requires that a transmitting authorization be posted near the transmitter.  It would have the frequency on it.

Also this might help:  http://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?ctid=1192#cid-2523

And this:  http://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?action=cfcc&xid=1192&t=2&os=0&s=fr&bf=89

73, Wayne N1WR


From: Jim Tetlow 
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:46 PM
To: 'Calvert Amateur Radio Association - K3CAL' 
Subject: Re: [K3CAL] interesting intermod read


That is great we will research the county for the exact frequency and that is still in the right price range. 

 

Regards,

Jim Tetlow

 

K3UGA

jimtetlow at chesapeake.net

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: k3cal-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:k3cal-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of wa4prr at comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:59 AM
To: Calvert Amateur Radio Association - K3CAL
Subject: Re: [K3CAL] interesting intermod read

 

Jim & All-

I just talked to Dale at PAR.  He recommends a custom High-Pass Filter to eliminate both the 39 MHz pager and the 106.7 FM signal from reaching our receiver front end.  It would be installed at the receiver input after the duplexer.  It will be a custom filter, built for us, and will cost $119.00.  He can produce a filter in about 3 days after order.  If we want to pursue this solution, I will need the exact frequency of the county pager.  

Good find on the filter company, Jim.

Ron


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Jim Tetlow" <jimtetlow at chesapeake.net>
To: "Calvert Amateur Radio Association - K3CAL" <k3cal at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:22:29 AM
Subject: [K3CAL] interesting intermod read




All-FYI

 

While researching a filter for intermod. Most were limited to HT's and lower power transceivers; not repeaters. I did however find a link on eHam.net which I have attached above. Read review by NM7R; this may warrant some investigation of PAR notch filters (I think we are looking at a different frequency as 39mhz or so ) but these can be built custom, still under $100.00 and he used this on a repeater. The downside it may limit sensitivity on receive side. Just a thought, comments encouraged.

 

Regards,

Jim Tetlow

 

K3UGA

jimtetlow at chesapeake.net

 


______________________________________________________________
K3CAL mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/k3cal
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:K3CAL at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


______________________________________________________________
K3CAL mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/k3cal
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:K3CAL at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/k3cal/attachments/20110726/e0eb49c6/attachment-0001.html