[Johnson] Viking 1 "gotchas" ?
Bry Carling
bcarling at cfl.rr.com
Fri Feb 22 13:55:26 EST 2013
Many thanks Richard.
Richard Knoppow <1oldlens1 at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <tbs50a at aol.com>
>To: <bcarling at cfl.rr.com>; <burnsguitar at yahoo.com>;
><patrick at ae1pt.com>
>Cc: <Johnson at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:53 AM
>Subject: Re: [Johnson] Viking 1 "gotchas" ?
>
>
>> Hi Brian and Bry,
>> One the V1 a few thinks come to mind. Bry mentioned the
>> final toob.Oringinally it used a 4D32 but at one time they
>> where very expensive is Johnson came up with a mod to use
>> a 829B.The output is a little less abt 85wt vs 120wts. The
>> 4D32 was abt $100 vs $10 for the 829B. In the 1990's a
>> bunch of the 4D32's hit the surplus market at $20.\
>> Always make sure that you have grid drive to the final
>> before you apply the HV. Originally the V1 didn't have a
>> clamp toob so you can wasted the final.
>> Three things come to mind on the electronics.The voltage
>> divider resistor R13? 15K 50watts Usually open..When open
>> you won't have screen grid voltage on the mod & final
>> Clean the meter switch really well. And pull out the
>> roller inductor and clean it too.
>> Bry, On your D-104 I read somewhere that in the cartige
>> there is a diaphragm with a pin in the center of it. That
>> pin has a wax seal on it. Use heat to reflow the wax on to
>> the pin. That should fix your low fq problem. Long time no
>> chat OM.Have been in bed all week with a bum back. If you
>> could say a few words in prayer that would be wonderful!!
>> GL&GB
>> Terry N3GTE
>>
>
> Most crystal microphones and headphones, at least the
>ones with diaphragms (there is another kind) drive the
>diaphragm with a pin. I would be very careful of using heat
>because heat can destroy the crystal element. They are
>sensitive to heat and moisture. One of the features of the
>Astatic crystal mics was their method of sealing the element
>to prevent moisture damage.
> The D-104 does not have a lot of low end; this one may
>be normal. I would compare it to another to be sure. The
>D-104 was designed for voice communication purposes and has
>a steeply rising response curve with a fairly sharp peak at
>about 4 khz. It can sound metallic or tinny. Also, the load
>impedance has a very strong effect on the response of a
>crystal mic; the element looks electrically like a capacitor
>so any parallel resistance makes it a high pass filter.
>Crystal mics want to work into a very high impedance, the
>closer to infinite the better, but a megohm or more anyway.
>Many mic pre-amps present too low an impedance causing the
>low end to roll off. Since the D-104 does not have a lot of
>low end to begin with it becomes very tinny. Putting a 100K
>resistor in series with it may help. Also cable capacitance
>is important; excessive capacitance rolls of the high end
>and reduces the output level. Short cables of
>low-capacitance co-ax are necessary.
> You can probably do better with another kind of
>microphone. Crystal mics were popular because they were
>relatively inexpensive for the quality and because they put
>out very high levels. The latter was of importance when
>electronic amplification was expensive. The construction is
>simple compared to a moving coil or ribbon dynamic mic but
>the usual conical metal diaphragm limits the quality.
> Long ago "sound cell" type crystal mics were available
>where the crystal element was directly exposed to the sound
>waves. These had quite high fidelity and extended
>high-frequency response but very low level. Brush
>Development and some other companies made sound-cell mics
>for measurement purposes and occasional use in sound
>recording. They are essentially obsolete now.
> FWIW, I have two D-104's, both sound exactly alike and
>both sound tinny to my no longer very good hearing.
>Currently, I am using an Electro-Voice 664, which gets good
>reports. There are newer mics with similar characteristics.
>
>
>--
>Richard Knoppow
>Los Angeles
>WB6KBL
>dickburk at ix.netcom.com
regards,
Bry Carling
--
Sent from mobile phone.
More information about the Johnson
mailing list