[Johnson] Tube Designation

[Peter Markavage]

Yep. It should be the other way around.

Pete, wa2cwa
http://www.manualman.com

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:35:50 -0400 "jeremy-ca" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
writes:
> Well, if I had someone tell me that any of my phasing rigs sounded 
> like a 
> ricebox I'd be highly insulted. And then figure out what I had done 
> wrong.
> 
> Carl
> KM1H
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "James M. Walker" <chejmw at buffalo.edu>
> To: <johnson at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [Johnson] Tube Designation
> 
> 
> > Time to weigh in here,
> > I acquired the HT-37, a pair of Pacemakers. W/ Thunderbolts, and 
> I
> > also have TX-1 (Apaches), w/SB-10 SSB adapter, and even a DX-100B
> > with the additional SB-10. Never had any problem with the 
> suppression
> > or tune-up. Signal reports on air on all modes, were/are 
> complimentary
> > no complaints, with statements like "Sounds like one of the new 
> solid 
> > state rigs".
> >
> > Never any problems with carrier suppression, drive levels to the 
> amps,
> > in the case of the Heathkit gear the amplifiers are a pair of 
> HA-10
> > Warriors. Course as always YMMV, FWIW!
> >
> > Jim
> > WB2FCN
> > eshop1.chem.buffalo.edu
>