[ILQSO] RTTY

[kf9tl at att.net]

That mostly left with the CW requirement.  You didn't think that would
actually help did you?

Mark KF9TL 


-----Original Message-----
From: ilqso-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:ilqso-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of w9dy at juno.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 4:58 PM
To: ILQSO at MAILMAN.QTH.NET
Subject: [ILQSO] RTTY

I see lots of complaints about propagation but am I the only one who had a
BIG problem with all the RTTY on 40? 

I think it's a crime to allow "non-hams", (that is, licensed but using CW
frequencies when they don't even know there is such a thing as Morse). 
Not sure if their actions are illegal but there USED to be such a thing
as the Gentlemen's Agreement.   Maybe no more Gentlemen left.  

But it was fun, as usual, despite the QRM. 

Bud   W9DY
_______________________________________________
ILQSO mailing list
ILQSO at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ilqso
ILQP webpage:
http://www.w9awe.org/ILQP.html
list administrator is Danny NG9R
for list problems contact ng9r at arrl.net