[ICOM] Icom 7200 noise blanker
Paul Manuel
k4pdm at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 13 16:34:30 EDT 2013
I'm convinced the best noise reduction step is to move the antenna as far as possible away from the noise.
I am sitting here with my ladderline feeder located 8 inches from a satellite receiver and 2 feet from a DVD player. I have 6 satellite receivers plugged in right now in the house and also 6 flat screen TVs. My noise level is S-0.
And I cause absolutely no TVI when running a kilowatt on any band.
But my antenna is 300 feet from the house.
73 Paul K4PDM
Sent from my MOTOROLA ATRIX™ HD on AT&T
Larry Young <k4lxv at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>John: You may be better served by better informing yourself about noise
>interference and how to detect and eliminate it from your home, instead
>of having the receiver trying to take care of it. There are many avenues
> for noise to enter your receiver, and if you can find and prevent its
>entry you will likely be much better and less costly served. There are
>many tutorials regarding this subject on the internet. There will likely
> be more than just one solution, and you may have to implement several
>in order to reduce your noise to a tolerable level. My own case of noise
> involved a noisy Satelight receiver, a DVD player power supply, and
>bonding my rig, power supply and amplifier to a common strap and then to
> earth ground. Each step took an S7 background noise eventually to an
>S3. It takes some work and effort to get there, but there is no magic
>"noise blanker or noise reduction" circuit that will just take it all
>down to nothing.
>Good Luck,
>Larry K4LXV
>
>
>--- On Wed, 3/13/13, John <af5cc at fidmail.com> wrote:
>
>From: John <af5cc at fidmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [ICOM] Icom 7200 noise blanker
>To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
>Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2013, 3:42 PM
>
>Tried them before. Never could get them to do a whole lot
>
>John AF5CC
>
>On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 2:57 PM, <w7apm at mtaonline.net> wrote:
>> A Timewave ANC-4 or maybe the MFJ 1025 or 1026 may be a better choice
>>
>> Good Luck
>> Marty
>>
>> --- af5cc at fidmail.com wrote:
>>
>> From: John <af5cc at fidmail.com>
>> To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
>> Subject: [ICOM] Icom 7200 noise blanker
>> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:52:24 -0500
>>
>> I have a really bad noise on 17m (and sometimes other bands) that
>> really makes it hard to hear signals at times. It sounds like some
>> sort of electrical crud from consumer electronics, or something like
>> that. It might be powerline noise, but I really don't think so.
>> Anyways, I know the best solution is to remove the source of the
>> noise, but that isn't always possible.
>>
>> I asked on eham.net about rigs with good NBs and the 7000 was
>> mentioned a couple of times, and then I remembered that the 7200 has
>> the same NB, I think. After mentioning that one, a couple of hams
>> said the NB works pretty good. It also is cheapter than the 7000 and
>> looks more rugged (important in my household). Also, the eham.net
>> reviews on the 7200 would mention the NB as well. So, is it really as
>> good as people say? Is the 7200 a pretty good rig overall for the
>> price?
>>
>> Any suggestions or experiences would be most welcome!
>>
>> John AF5CC
>> ----
>> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>
>----
>Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
>Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
>Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
>To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Icom
mailing list