[ICOM] Icom 740 vs 751A

[Larry Young]

John: Receiver performance is a very subjective thing. A good performing receiver to one person my not be good to another. For example. For cw contesting, performance at 2 khz may be very important , whereas an ssb operator knows that a strong station 2 khz away is going to have 3rd and 5th order splatter products anyway.Sensitivity is likely not an issue on any modern receiver, but frequency stability and  PLL phase noise might be.Most knowledgeable hams know that a noise blanker is designed primarily to reduce inpulse type noise whereas a DSP noise reduction may resuce some of all three types of noise. You may want to study and garner information from various sources so you can make the most informed decision that best suits your type and style of operating.
Larry K4LXV

--- On Sat, 3/31/12, John G. <af5cc at fidmail.com> wrote:

From: John G. <af5cc at fidmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ICOM] Icom 740 vs 751A
To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Date: Saturday, March 31, 2012, 6:00 PM

Hi Gil,

How did the 746PRO compare to the 740 and 751A in terms of receiver 
performance?

John AF5CC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "gil Kellersman Jr" <gilkell13 at yahoo.com>
To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [ICOM] Icom 740 vs 751A


I owned both the 740 and the 751A each for 10 years. The 740 was a great 
radio but the 751A was far superior in almost every aspect and was one of 
the best transceivers ever built. I then had a 746 PRO for 5 years and now 
have the the 7410 which by far is superior to any of these radios in every 
aspect.
go to http://www.eham.net/reviews/products/14 and check the reviews:

751a a perfect 5.0 with 94 reviews
740 is a 4.6, 30 reviews

Good luck, Gil



________________________________
 From: Vladimir Sidarau <vs.lists at gmail.com>
To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: [ICOM] Icom 740 vs 751A

The two rigs are pretty much on par but the 740's receiver is perhaps
even better than the 751A because the 740 is a HAM-bands-only rig,
while the 751A provides general coverage. The rest is pretty much the
same. The NBs are just so-so.

If you have an experience with more modern rigs, it will be quite
annoying to see the 10 Hz tuning step and absence of computer control.
But everything depends of your interests, of course. Still, the 740 is
famous for its incredible receiver, first of all, due to its
outstanding sensitivity.

73,
Vladimir VE3IAE

---







On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:46 PM, John G. <af5cc at fidmail.com> wrote:
> I am looking at a fully loaded Icom 740 for what seems like a decent 
> price. It has 2 CW filters, mechanical 3rd IF SSB filter, keyer, ect. For 
> the price one might also be able to find an Icom 751A. How do the 
> receivers compare in these two rigs? Is the 751A a much better rig than 
> the 740? How does the NB in each one compare in taking out line noise and 
> stuff like that?
>
> 73 John AF5CC
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

----
Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html