[ICOM] Most rugged HF transceivers

John af5cc at fidmail.com
Thu Jun 14 15:52:39 EDT 2012


Wow, is the 728 that old?  I thought it came out in the early 90s.

John AF5CC

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:20 PM, JOHN <ku3g at yahoo.com> wrote:

> i have an icom 728 still working after about 35 years been dropped several
> times
> 73 john ku3g
>
> From: John <af5cc at fidmail.com>
> To: ICOM Reflector <icom at mailman.qth.net>; icomradio at yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:40 PM
> Subject: [ICOM] Most rugged HF transceivers
>
> I am interested in what people would consider the most rugged Icom HF or
> HF/VHF transceivers (new or used).  By rugged I mean able to withstand the
> most abuse (environmental, not operator induced).  This would include being
> slapped at times, hit with thrown object, and everything else that might
> occur in a chaotic enviroment.  So, which rigs would withstand this
> environment with the least chance of being damaged?  A low price point
> would also be good in case it was damaged, one would not be out a lot of
> money.
>
> John AF5CC
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>


More information about the Icom mailing list